Rebecca Files

741 citations
20 papers · 575 indexed · h-index 10
Topics
Corporate Finance and Governance (13 papers)Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (11 papers)Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (7 papers)
Partner nations
United StatesHong Kong

In The Last Decade

Rebecca Files

19 papers receiving 538 citations

Peers

Rebecca Files
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Accounting 525
  • Finance 190
  • Strategy and Management 182
  • Economics and Econometrics 80
  • Management Information Systems 51
Replace Isho Tama-Sweet with:
Isho Tama-Sweet United States
Inho Suk United States
James Ryans United Kingdom
Pingyang Gao United States
Yibin Zhou United States
Steve Lin United States
Jeffrey J. Burks United States
Byung T. Ro United States
Kenneth L. Bills United States
Cory A. Cassell United States
Rebecca Files relative to Isho Tama-Sweet United States Isho Tama-Sweet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Isho Tama-Sweet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Files

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Files's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Files with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Files more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Files

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Files. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Files. The network helps show where Rebecca Files may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Files

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Files. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Files based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Files. Rebecca Files is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 5
3 1
4
Investor Response to Critical Audit Matter (CAM) Disclosures
2
5 17
6 1
7 40
8 1
9 53
10 9
11 2
12 12
13 46
14 80
15 2
16 97
17
The Impact of Restatements on Bank Loans: Evidence from the Supply Chain
3
18
Do More Transparent Corporate Actions Following a Restatement Influence the SEC's Decision to Issue an Enforcement Action?
1
19 168
20 34

About Rebecca Files

Rebecca Files is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance and Strategy and Management, having authored 20 papers that have together received 575 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (13 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (11 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (525 citations), Finance (190 citations) and Strategy and Management (182 citations). Rebecca Files has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Edward P. Swanson, Senyo Y. Tse, Anne Thompson, Nathan Y. Sharp, Umit G. Gurun, Jap Efendi, Bo Ouyang, Gerald S. Martin, Meilin Liu and Todd D. Kravet. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Accounting and Economics, The Accounting Review and Contemporary Accounting Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026