Rebecca E. Kelly
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Warren MansellAlex M. WoodAlyson DoddAmy HardyTimothy A. CareyYousra AlatiqSara TaiSarah M. McGhee
- Topics
- Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Applied PsychologyNeuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyExperimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Journals
- Personality and Individual DifferencesJournal of Affective DisordersFrontiers in Psychology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Rebecca E. Kelly
12 papers receiving 269 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Clinical Psychology 126
- Social Psychology 96
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 87
- Psychiatry and Mental health 83
- Applied Psychology 69
Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca E. Kelly
This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca E. Kelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca E. Kelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca E. Kelly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca E. Kelly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca E. Kelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca E. Kelly. The network helps show where Rebecca E. Kelly may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca E. Kelly
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca E. Kelly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca E. Kelly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca E. Kelly. Rebecca E. Kelly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 69 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | Extreme and conflicting appraisals of activated internal states discriminate remitted bipolar disorder from remitted unipolar depression and non-clinical controls. | 1 |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 10 |
About Rebecca E. Kelly
Rebecca E. Kelly is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (69 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (87 citations). Rebecca E. Kelly has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Warren Mansell, Alex M. Wood, Alyson Dodd, Amy Hardy, Timothy A. Carey, Yousra Alatiq, Sara Tai, Sarah M. McGhee, Eleanor Leigh and Patrick Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Journal of Affective Disorders and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.