R.E. Spier

2.8k citations
107 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

R.E. Spier

103 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

R.E. Spier
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Molecular Biology 1.0k
  • Biotechnology 119
  • Virology 62
  • Biomedical Engineering 493
  • Infectious Diseases 182
Replace Mona O. Mohsen with:
Mona O. Mohsen Switzerland
Yvonne Genzel Germany
António Roldão Portugal
Ozan S. Kumru United States
Lunan Wang China
Frederick Porter United States
Shigeharu Ueda Japan
Linda H.L. Lua Australia
Luis A. Brito United States
Robert K. Evans United States
R.E. Spier relative to Mona O. Mohsen Switzerland Mona O. Mohsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Mona O. Mohsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.E. Spier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.E. Spier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.E. Spier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.E. Spier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.E. Spier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.E. Spier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.E. Spier. The network helps show where R.E. Spier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R.E. Spier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.E. Spier Line = papers co-authored together R.E. Spier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989193
2 198887
3 198980
4 198472
5 200165
6 198965
7
Animal cell technology : products of today, prospects for tomorrow
199460
8 199056
9
Animal cell technology : developments, processes, and products
199255
10 199255
11 199453
12 199246
13 197644
14 197640
15 198539
16 198735
17 198033
18 199331
19 200228
20 198727

About R.E. Spier

R.E. Spier is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Health, Genetics and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 107 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (34 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (14 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (14 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (11 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (11 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (7 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (7 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (1.0k citations), Biotechnology (119 citations), Virology (62 citations), Biomedical Engineering (493 citations) and Infectious Diseases (182 citations). R.E. Spier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include A. Handa‐Corrigan, Katherine A. Kentistou, J. B. Griffiths, Michael Butler, John Clarke, W. Berthold, N.F. Kirkby, C. MacDonald, P. M. Hayter and A. Kadouri. Their work appears in journals such as Vaccine, Science and Engineering Ethics, Enzyme and Microbial Technology, Biotechnology and Bioengineering and Journal of Biotechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact