This map shows the geographic impact of RE Morgan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by RE Morgan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RE Morgan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by RE Morgan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by RE Morgan. The network helps show where RE Morgan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of RE Morgan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of RE Morgan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of RE Morgan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with RE Morgan. RE Morgan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Evans, Malcolm D. & RE Morgan. (2001). Combating torture in Europe: the work and standards of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT).7 indexed citations
3.
Morgan, RE, et al.. (1999). The Admissibility and Sufficiency of Evidence in Child Abuse Prosecutions. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).3 indexed citations
4.
Morgan, RE, et al.. (1999). An Assessment of the Admissibility and Sufficiency of Evidence in Child Abuse Prosecutions. Explore Bristol Research.26 indexed citations
5.
Morgan, RE. (1999). Crime is not the problem: lethal violence in America. Explore Bristol Research. 38(2). 313–317.22 indexed citations
6.
Morgan, RE. (1999). Moderate psychological pressure: the Scandinavian Way?. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 201–204.1 indexed citations
7.
Morgan, RE. (1998). Preventing torture and protecting prisoners. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 11(76). 178–180.1 indexed citations
8.
Morgan, RE. (1998). The aims of imprisonment revisited. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 62–70.3 indexed citations
9.
Morgan, RE, et al.. (1998). Clause 1 - the hybrid law from hell. Explore Bristol Research. 31. 16–25.4 indexed citations
10.
Morgan, RE. (1997). Imprisonment: current concerns and a brief history. Explore Bristol Research. 1137–1195.5 indexed citations
11.
Morgan, RE. (1997). Are custody, control and justice compatible? The aims of imprisonment revisited. Explore Bristol Research. 62–71.1 indexed citations
12.
Morgan, RE & Malcolm D. Evans. (1997). 20 ANS Consacrès à la rèalisation d'une idèe.1 indexed citations
13.
Morgan, RE. (1996). Learmont: dangerously unbalanced. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 346–353.1 indexed citations
14.
Morgan, RE. (1996). Tortures et traitements inhumains ou dègradants en Eùrope: Quelques Données, Quelques Questions. Explore Bristol Research.2 indexed citations
15.
Morgan, RE & Mark Maguire. (1995). Accountability for Criminal Justice: Selected Essays.26 indexed citations
16.
Morgan, RE. (1995). Making Consultation Work: A Handbook for Those Involved in Police Community Consultation Arrangements. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).2 indexed citations
17.
Morgan, RE. (1995). Human Rights in Prison: The Professional Training of Prison Officials.1 indexed citations
18.
Morgan, RE. (1994). Punitive policies and politics: crowding English prisons. Explore Bristol Research. 1–10.1 indexed citations
19.
Morgan, RE. (1994). The politics of sentencing. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 154. 144–151.3 indexed citations
20.
Morgan, RE. (1994). Minimising the risk of suicide in custody. Explore Bristol Research.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.