Marie Howes
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Crime Patterns and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 3
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 2
-
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 4
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 1
- Co-authors
- Joanna Shapland (5 shared papers)Angela Sorsby (5 shared papers)H.V. Atkinson (5 shared papers)Gwen Robinson (5 shared papers)James Dignan (2 shared papers)Loraine Gelsthorpe (1 shared paper)David Melzer (1 shared paper)Howard Meltzer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Criminology & Criminal Justice (1 paper)Theoretical Criminology (1 paper)Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Marie Howes
6 papers receiving 226 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Clinical Psychology 155
- Sociology and Political Science 226
- Law 44
- Conservation 12
- Gender Studies 12
Countries citing papers authored by Marie Howes
This map shows the geographic impact of Marie Howes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marie Howes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marie Howes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marie Howes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marie Howes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marie Howes. The network helps show where Marie Howes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Marie Howes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Does restorative justice affect reconviction? The fourth report from the evaluation of three schemes | 2008 | 88 |
| 2 | 2006 | 76 | |
| 3 | Restorative justice: the views of victims and offenders. The third report from the evaluation of three schemes | 2007 | 34 |
| 4 | Restorative Justice In Practice: The Second Report From The Evaluation Of Three Schemes | 2006 | 28 |
| 5 | 2007 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 12 |
About Marie Howes
Marie Howes is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Law, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (1 paper), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 paper), Mental Health Treatment and Access (1 paper), Law in Society and Culture (1 paper) and Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (155 citations), Sociology and Political Science (226 citations), Law (44 citations), Conservation (12 citations) and Gender Studies (12 citations). Marie Howes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joanna Shapland, Angela Sorsby, H.V. Atkinson, Gwen Robinson, James Dignan, Loraine Gelsthorpe, David Melzer, Howard Meltzer, Traolach Brugha and Adrian Grounds. Their work appears in journals such as Criminology & Criminal Justice, Theoretical Criminology and Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.