R.B. Kemp

88 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

R.B. Kemp
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 557
  • Filtration and Separation 43
  • Molecular Biology 765
  • Cell Biology 148
  • Biotechnology 69
Replace Lana Fall with:
Lana Fall United States
E. A. Galinski Germany
Nelly M. Tsvetkova United States
Michael Sinensky United States
Brent S. Kendrick United States
M.J. Ashwood-Smith Canada
Hookeun Lee South Korea
Boris Rotman United States
Yufeng Liu China
Lawrence J. Dangott United States
R.B. Kemp relative to Lana Fall United States Lana Fall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
Lana Fall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.B. Kemp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.B. Kemp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.B. Kemp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.B. Kemp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.B. Kemp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.B. Kemp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.B. Kemp. The network helps show where R.B. Kemp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R.B. Kemp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.B. Kemp Line = papers co-authored together R.B. Kemp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990151
2 197068
3 196867
4 197063
5 197354
6 200752
7 199849
8 196748
9 200946
10 198846
11 198942
12 200335
13 199735
14 197033
15 200033
16 199129
17 200128
18 197527
19 200425
20 197125

About R.B. Kemp

R.B. Kemp is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Ecology and Oceanography, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses (37 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (18 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (11 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (10 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (6 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (5 papers), Marine and environmental studies (5 papers) and Animal testing and alternatives (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (557 citations), Filtration and Separation (43 citations), Molecular Biology (765 citations), Cell Biology (148 citations) and Biotechnology (69 citations). R.B. Kemp has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ukraine and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Erich Gnaiger, B. M. Jones, Yue Guan, U. Gröschel‐Stewart, Peter Evans, David Lloyd, Robert K. Poole, Vladimir Mukhanov, Helen M. Garnett and Soraya P. Shirazi‐Beechey. Their work appears in journals such as Thermochimica Acta, Journal of Cell Science, Nature, Biotechnology and Bioengineering and Food and Chemical Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact