Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Dynamics of Structures
19771.2k citationsRay W. Clough, Joseph Penzien et al.profile →
Stiffness and Deflection Analysis of Complex Structures
This map shows the geographic impact of Ray W. Clough's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ray W. Clough with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ray W. Clough more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ray W. Clough. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ray W. Clough. The network helps show where Ray W. Clough may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ray W. Clough
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ray W. Clough.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ray W. Clough based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ray W. Clough. Ray W. Clough is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gülkan, Polat & Ray W. Clough. (1993). Developments in dynamic soil-structure interaction : [proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Developments in Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction, Kemer, Antalya, Turkey, July 8-16, 1992]. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks.2 indexed citations
3.
Aubry, D., D.E. Beskos, Anna Federica Castoldi, et al.. (1992). Announcement. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics. 16(3). 231–231.1 indexed citations
4.
Clough, Ray W., et al.. (1990). Arch dams : international workshop on arch dams, Coimbra, 5-9 April, 1987. A.A. Balkema eBooks.1 indexed citations
5.
Clough, Ray W.. (1989). Original Formulation of the Finite Element Method. 1–10.4 indexed citations
6.
Bertero, Vitelmo V. & Ray W. Clough. (1986). Interdependence of Dynamic Analysis and Experiment. 1–27.1 indexed citations
7.
Manos, George & Ray W. Clough. (1983). The measured and predicted shaking table response of a broad tank model.9 indexed citations
8.
Clough, Ray W. & Joseph Penzien. (1980). DYNAMIQUE DES STRUCTURES - TOME 1 - PRINCIPES FONDAMENTAUX.2 indexed citations
Mayes, Ronald L. & Ray W. Clough. (1975). State-of-the-art in seismic shear strength of masonry : an evaluation and review.26 indexed citations
13.
Clough, Ray W., et al.. (1975). Experimental Study of Structural Response to Earthquakes. NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries).1 indexed citations
Clough, Ray W. & Carlos A. Felippa. (1968). A Refined Quadrilateral Element for Analysis of Plate Bending. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).105 indexed citations
18.
Clough, Ray W.. (1966). Effect of stiffness degradation on earthquake ductility requirements. eScholarship (California Digital Library).299 indexed citations
19.
Clough, Ray W., et al.. (1965). Construction Stresses in Dworshak Dam. eScholarship (California Digital Library).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.