Ravi R. Pandit
- Surgery
- Epidemiology
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Health Information Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael V. BolandMathew David SewellPeter DömösNawfal Al‐HadithyAllen C. HoThomas L. JenkinsDavid XuSamir Patel
- Topics
- Retinal and Optic Conditions (7 papers)Retinal Imaging and Analysis (5 papers)Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ravi R. Pandit
19 papers receiving 258 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Surgery 132
- Epidemiology 130
- Ophthalmology 83
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 45
- Health Information Management 34
Countries citing papers authored by Ravi R. Pandit
This map shows the geographic impact of Ravi R. Pandit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ravi R. Pandit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ravi R. Pandit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ravi R. Pandit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ravi R. Pandit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ravi R. Pandit. The network helps show where Ravi R. Pandit may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ravi R. Pandit
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ravi R. Pandit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ravi R. Pandit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ravi R. Pandit. Ravi R. Pandit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Factors predicting distribution and practice patterns of retina providers across the United States (US) | 2 |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 62 | |
| 16 | The impact on staff efficiency of implementing a DICOM-compatible workflow in an academic ophthalmology practice | 1 |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 42 | |
| 19 | 15 |
About Ravi R. Pandit
Ravi R. Pandit is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Health Information Management and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 19 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Optic Conditions (7 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (5 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (83 citations), Health Information Management (34 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). Ravi R. Pandit has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael V. Boland, Mathew David Sewell, Peter Dömös, Nawfal Al‐Hadithy, Allen C. Ho, Thomas L. Jenkins, David Xu, Samir Patel, Pankaj Kumar Singh and Eric L. Singman. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.