Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
An Introduction to Metaphysics.
1960340 citationsRalph Manheim et al.The Philosophical Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ralph Manheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ralph Manheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ralph Manheim more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ralph Manheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ralph Manheim. The network helps show where Ralph Manheim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ralph Manheim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ralph Manheim.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ralph Manheim based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ralph Manheim. Ralph Manheim is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dow, James R. & Ralph Manheim. (1980). Grimm's Tales for Young and Old. Journal of American Folklore. 93(369). 356–356.12 indexed citations
6.
Brecht, Bertolt, et al.. (1979). The rise and fall of the city of Mahagonny ; and, The seven deadly sins of the Petty Bourgeoisie.
7.
Freud, Sigmund, et al.. (1979). The Freud/ Jung Letters: the Correspondence Between Sigmund Freud and C.G. Jung. Medical Entomology and Zoology.149 indexed citations
8.
Handke, Peter & Ralph Manheim. (1978). The Left-Handed Woman. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
Brecht, Bertolt, et al.. (1977). Measures Taken and Other Lehrstucke.1 indexed citations
11.
Manheim, Ralph & Peter Handke. (1976). A sorrow beyond dreams : a life story.2 indexed citations
12.
Brecht, Bertolt, et al.. (1976). Bertolt Brecht poems.1 indexed citations
13.
Jaspers, Karl, Hannah Arendt, & Ralph Manheim. (1974). Spinoza : from The great philosophers, the original thinkers.1 indexed citations
14.
Manheim, Ralph, et al.. (1973). A Woman Named Solitude. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
15.
Manheim, Ralph, et al.. (1967). Myth, religion, and mother right : selected writings of J.J. Bachofen. Princeton University Press eBooks.46 indexed citations
16.
Jaspers, Karl, Hannah Arendt, & Ralph Manheim. (1962). Plato and Augustine.4 indexed citations
17.
Klee, Paul, et al.. (1961). Paul Klee, the thinking eye : the notebooks of Paul Klee. Medical Entomology and Zoology.8 indexed citations
18.
Cole, James L., Ernst Cassirer, Ralph Manheim, & Charles W. Hendel. (1957). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Volume II.. The Philosophical Review. 66(2). 251–251.7 indexed citations
19.
Klee, Paul, et al.. (1956). Paul Klee Notebooks. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.