Ralph M. Reitan

21.8k total citations · 4 hit papers
169 papers, 16.7k citations indexed

About

Ralph M. Reitan is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ralph M. Reitan has authored 169 papers receiving a total of 16.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 40 papers in Epidemiology and 35 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Ralph M. Reitan's work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (40 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (16 papers) and Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (15 papers). Ralph M. Reitan is often cited by papers focused on Traumatic Brain Injury Research (40 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (16 papers) and Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (15 papers). Ralph M. Reitan collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Ralph M. Reitan's co-authors include D.E. Wolfson, Kathleen B. Fitzhugh, Loren C. Fitzhugh, Thomas J. Boll, Alan Finlayson, Homer B. Reed, Sureyya Dikmen, Jim Hom, Lawrence Wheeler and Robert F. Heimburger and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Neurology and Annals of Neurology.

In The Last Decade

Ralph M. Reitan

157 papers receiving 15.3k citations

Hit Papers

Validity of the Trail Making Test as an Indicator of Orga... 1955 2026 1978 2002 1958 1993 1955 1958 2.0k 4.0k 6.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ralph M. Reitan United States 45 6.9k 6.1k 2.8k 2.3k 2.0k 169 16.7k
Victor Whitehead Canada 23 7.1k 1.0× 5.5k 0.9× 1.8k 0.6× 1.7k 0.7× 3.3k 1.7× 42 18.8k
Tom N. Tombaugh Canada 26 4.3k 0.6× 2.9k 0.5× 1.7k 0.6× 1.3k 0.6× 1.2k 0.6× 78 11.0k
Dean C. Delis United States 64 5.3k 0.8× 6.1k 1.0× 1.7k 0.6× 1.8k 0.8× 1.2k 0.6× 189 14.1k
Edith Kaplan United States 44 5.0k 0.7× 6.9k 1.1× 1.0k 0.4× 1.7k 0.8× 1.2k 0.6× 86 12.8k
Robert K. Heaton United States 83 12.0k 1.7× 6.9k 1.1× 2.4k 0.8× 3.6k 1.6× 1.3k 0.7× 335 24.2k
Isabelle Collin Canada 4 6.4k 0.9× 4.8k 0.8× 1.7k 0.6× 1.5k 0.7× 3.3k 1.7× 6 17.1k
Simon Charbonneau Canada 5 6.4k 0.9× 4.8k 0.8× 1.7k 0.6× 1.6k 0.7× 3.3k 1.7× 15 17.2k
Jerome A. Yesavage United States 60 11.7k 1.7× 7.4k 1.2× 2.2k 0.8× 4.4k 1.9× 1.7k 0.9× 368 31.8k
Robin G. Morris United Kingdom 70 5.9k 0.9× 6.3k 1.0× 1.0k 0.4× 1.6k 0.7× 1.6k 0.8× 319 15.3k
Ina J. Berg Netherlands 12 7.4k 1.1× 4.0k 0.7× 1.1k 0.4× 1.3k 0.6× 1.9k 1.0× 21 16.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Ralph M. Reitan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ralph M. Reitan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ralph M. Reitan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ralph M. Reitan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ralph M. Reitan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ralph M. Reitan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ralph M. Reitan. The network helps show where Ralph M. Reitan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ralph M. Reitan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ralph M. Reitan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ralph M. Reitan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ralph M. Reitan. Ralph M. Reitan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Reitan, Ralph M. & D.E. Wolfson. (2008). Serial Testing of Older Children as a Basis for Recommending Comprehensive Neuropsychological Evaluation. Applied Neuropsychology. 15(1). 11–20. 12 indexed citations
2.
Reitan, Ralph M. & D.E. Wolfson. (2008). Can Neuropsychological Testing Produce Unequivocal Evidence of Brain Damage? II. Testing for Right vs. Left Differences. Applied Neuropsychology. 15(1). 39–43. 3 indexed citations
3.
Reitan, Ralph M. & D.E. Wolfson. (2005). The effect of conation in determining the differential variance among brain-damaged and nonbrain-damaged persons across a broad range of neuropsychological tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 20(8). 957–966. 4 indexed citations
4.
Reitan, Ralph M. & D.E. Wolfson. (2004). Clinical and Forensic Issues Regarding Age, Education, and the Validity of Neuropsychological Test Results. 4(1). 1–32. 9 indexed citations
5.
Reitan, Ralph M.. (2003). The differential effect of conation on intelligence test scores among brain-damaged and control subjects. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 19(1). 29–35. 7 indexed citations
6.
Reitan, Ralph M.. (2000). Conation A Neglected Aspect of Neuropsychological Functioning. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 15(5). 443–453. 9 indexed citations
7.
Reitan, Ralph M.. (2000). The Neuropsychological Similarities of Mild and More Severe Head Injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 15(5). 433–442. 2 indexed citations
8.
Reitan, Ralph M. & D.E. Wolfson. (1996). Relationships between specific and general tests of cerebral functioning. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 10(1). 37–42. 8 indexed citations
9.
Reitan, Ralph M.. (1996). The question of validity of neuropsychological test scores among head-injured litigants: Development of a dissimulation index. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 11(7). 573–580.
10.
Reitan, Ralph M. & D.E. Wolfson. (1995). Consistency of responses on retesting among head-injured subjects in litigation versus head-injured subjects not in litigation. Applied Neuropsychology. 2(2). 67–71. 10 indexed citations
11.
Reitan, Ralph M. & D.E. Wolfson. (1995). Category test and trail making test as measures of frontal lobe functions. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 9(1). 50–56. 289 indexed citations
12.
Reitan, Ralph M. & D.E. Wolfson. (1992). A short screening examination for impaired brain functions in early school-age children. Clinical Neuropsychologist. 6(3). 287–294. 5 indexed citations
13.
Reitan, Ralph M., et al.. (1988). The validity of the MMPI with multiple sclerosis patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 44(5). 764–769. 37 indexed citations
14.
Reitan, Ralph M.. (1984). Aphasia and Sensory-Perceptual Deficits in Children. 20 indexed citations
15.
Finlayson, Alan & Ralph M. Reitan. (1980). Effect of lateralized lesions on ipsilateral and contralateral motor functioning. 2(3). 237–243. 16 indexed citations
16.
Reitan, Ralph M.. (1971). Trail Making Test Results for Normal and Brain-Damaged Children. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 33(2). 575–581. 265 indexed citations
17.
Reitan, Ralph M.. (1970). Brain Structure and Brain Function.. 6(5). 966–7.
18.
Reitan, Ralph M.. (1966). Problems and Prospects in Studying the Psychological Correlates of Brain Lesions. Cortex. 2(1). 127–154. 65 indexed citations
19.
Reitan, Ralph M.. (1958). Validity of the Trail Making Test as an Indicator of Organic Brain Damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 8(3). 271–276. 6363 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Reitan, Ralph M.. (1955). The Relation of Rorschach Test Ratios to Brain Injury. The Journal of General Psychology. 53(1). 97–107. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026