Raj K. Prabhu
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Surgery
- Biomaterials
- Co-authors
- Jun LiaoLakiesha N. WilliamsM.F. HorstemeyerHarish ChanderAdam C. KnightReuben F. BurchJohn E. BallBrian Smith
- Topics
- Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics (30 papers)Traumatic Brain Injury Research (12 papers)Elasticity and Material Modeling (12 papers)
- Journals
- CirculationThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
Raj K. Prabhu
79 papers receiving 907 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Biomedical Engineering 409
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 228
- Epidemiology 102
- Surgery 101
- Biomaterials 85
Countries citing papers authored by Raj K. Prabhu
This map shows the geographic impact of Raj K. Prabhu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raj K. Prabhu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raj K. Prabhu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raj K. Prabhu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raj K. Prabhu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raj K. Prabhu. The network helps show where Raj K. Prabhu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raj K. Prabhu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raj K. Prabhu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raj K. Prabhu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Raj K. Prabhu. Raj K. Prabhu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | Ocean Circulation Velocities Over the Continents During Noah's Flood | 2 |
| 20 | The task before Indian students | 1 |
About Raj K. Prabhu
Raj K. Prabhu is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Ophthalmology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 92 papers that have together received 938 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics (30 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (12 papers) and Elasticity and Material Modeling (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (409 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (74 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (228 citations). Raj K. Prabhu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Jun Liao, Lakiesha N. Williams, M.F. Horstemeyer, Harish Chander, Adam C. Knight, Reuben F. Burch, John E. Ball, Brian Smith, Tony Luczak and Steven H. Elder. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, The Journal of Chemical Physics and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.