Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
PSPLIB - A project scheduling problem library
1997924 citationsRainer Kolisch, Arno Sprecherprofile →
Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling: An update
Countries citing papers authored by Rainer Kolisch
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Rainer Kolisch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rainer Kolisch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rainer Kolisch more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rainer Kolisch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rainer Kolisch. The network helps show where Rainer Kolisch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rainer Kolisch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rainer Kolisch.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rainer Kolisch based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rainer Kolisch. Rainer Kolisch is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kolisch, Rainer, et al.. (2000). OR-Software: Numetrix/3 Production Scheduling. TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt).1 indexed citations
11.
Drexl, Andreas, et al.. (1999). Projektmanagement bei flexiblen Arbeitszeiten. TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt). 10(4). 431–447.
12.
Kolisch, Rainer & Rema Padman. (1997). An integrated survey of project scheduling. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.41 indexed citations
13.
Kolisch, Rainer & Arno Sprecher. (1996). PSPLIB - a project scheduling problem library. Econstor (Econstor).21 indexed citations
14.
Kolisch, Rainer, et al.. (1996). Auswahl von Standardsoftware, dargestellt am Beispiel von Programmen für das Projektmanagement. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK. 38(4). 399–410.2 indexed citations
15.
Kolisch, Rainer. (1996). Investitionsplanung in Netzwerken. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
16.
Kolisch, Rainer, et al.. (1995). Experimentelle Evaluation der methodischen Fundierung von Projektmanagementsoftware. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).3 indexed citations
17.
Kolisch, Rainer. (1994). Efficient priority rules for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.4 indexed citations
18.
Kolisch, Rainer. (1994). Serial and parallel resource-constrained projekt scheduling methodes revisited: Theory and computation. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).2 indexed citations
19.
Drexl, Andreas & Rainer Kolisch. (1994). Model-based assembly management in machine tool manufacturing. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).1 indexed citations
20.
Kolisch, Rainer, Arno Sprecher, & Andreas Drexl. (1992). Characterization and generation of a general class of resource-constrained project scheduling problems: Easy and hard instances. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).21 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.