Radek Fučík
- Computational Mechanics top 10%
- Environmental Engineering top 10%
- Mechanical Engineering
- Ocean Engineering top 10%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jiří MikyškaTissa H. IllangasekareMichal BenešRóbert StrakaMartin Vohralı́kIbrahim CheddadiToshihiro SakakiMartin Srnec
- Topics
- Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies (15 papers)Groundwater flow and contamination studies (12 papers)Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- CzechiaUnited StatesPoland
In The Last Decade
Radek Fučík
33 papers receiving 300 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Computational Mechanics 139
- Environmental Engineering 97
- Mechanical Engineering 72
- Ocean Engineering 58
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 47
Countries citing papers authored by Radek Fučík
This map shows the geographic impact of Radek Fučík's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Radek Fučík with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Radek Fučík more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Radek Fučík
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Radek Fučík. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Radek Fučík. The network helps show where Radek Fučík may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Radek Fučík
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Radek Fučík. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Radek Fučík based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Radek Fučík. Radek Fučík is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | Numerical study of the effect of dynamic capillary pressure in porous medium | 4 |
| 20 | 31 |
About Radek Fučík
Radek Fučík is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 38 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies (15 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (12 papers) and Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (97 citations), Computational Mechanics (139 citations) and Ocean Engineering (58 citations). Radek Fučík has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Jiří Mikyška, Tissa H. Illangasekare, Michal Beneš, Róbert Straka, Martin Vohralı́k, Ibrahim Cheddadi, Toshihiro Sakaki, Martin Srnec, Daniel Bím and Mauricio Maldonado‐Domínguez. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Accounts of Chemical Research and Water Resources Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.