Rachelle D. Hollander

923 total citations
25 papers, 339 citations indexed

About

Rachelle D. Hollander is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Information Systems and Management and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachelle D. Hollander has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 339 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Information Systems and Management and 3 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Rachelle D. Hollander's work include Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers) and Academic integrity and plagiarism (3 papers). Rachelle D. Hollander is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers) and Academic integrity and plagiarism (3 papers). Rachelle D. Hollander collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Rachelle D. Hollander's co-authors include Deborah G. Mayo, Jessica Wyndham, Dorothea K. Vafiadis, Rickey Y. Yada, Johanna Dwyer, Catherine E. Woteki, Kathryn J. Boor, Linda J. Harris, Alison Kretser and David B. Allison and has published in prestigious journals such as Communications of the ACM, Academic Medicine and Science Technology & Human Values.

In The Last Decade

Rachelle D. Hollander

23 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachelle D. Hollander United States 8 104 63 51 47 45 25 339
Govert Valkenburg Netherlands 10 106 1.0× 19 0.3× 29 0.6× 31 0.7× 14 0.3× 26 270
Melanie Smallman United Kingdom 9 109 1.0× 12 0.2× 27 0.5× 14 0.3× 27 0.6× 13 262
Kate Chatfield United Kingdom 9 68 0.7× 18 0.3× 51 1.0× 20 0.4× 39 0.9× 19 343
Richard Sedlmayr United Kingdom 3 70 0.7× 46 0.7× 35 0.7× 50 1.1× 19 0.4× 8 342
Barbara Kline Pope United States 5 36 0.3× 82 1.3× 53 1.0× 57 1.2× 15 0.3× 8 352
Hugo Confraria Netherlands 7 36 0.3× 19 0.3× 44 0.9× 6 0.1× 8 0.2× 9 292
Zehra Taşkın Türkiye 12 30 0.3× 73 1.2× 20 0.4× 9 0.2× 7 0.2× 35 386
Rosa Scoble United Kingdom 4 69 0.7× 35 0.6× 36 0.7× 3 0.1× 76 1.7× 7 379
Scout Calvert United States 5 70 0.7× 55 0.9× 35 0.7× 14 0.3× 48 1.1× 10 293
Molly Morgan Jones United Kingdom 12 29 0.3× 14 0.2× 46 0.9× 7 0.1× 70 1.6× 47 348

Countries citing papers authored by Rachelle D. Hollander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachelle D. Hollander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachelle D. Hollander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachelle D. Hollander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachelle D. Hollander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachelle D. Hollander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachelle D. Hollander. The network helps show where Rachelle D. Hollander may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachelle D. Hollander

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachelle D. Hollander. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachelle D. Hollander based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachelle D. Hollander. Rachelle D. Hollander is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kretser, Alison, Stefano Bertuzzi, David B. Allison, et al.. (2019). Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium. Science and Engineering Ethics. 25(2). 327–355. 83 indexed citations
2.
Hollander, Rachelle D., Michael Davis, Deni Elliott, & Michael S. Pritchard. (2017). Remembering Vivian Weil. Science and Engineering Ethics. 23(3). 637–651. 1 indexed citations
3.
Herkert, Joseph R., et al.. (2015). The Online Resource Center for Ethics Education in Engineering and Science. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 26.1560.1–26.1560.13. 4 indexed citations
4.
Ramaswami, Anu, Armistead G. Russell, Marian Chertow, et al.. (2014). International, Interdisciplinary Education on Sustainable Infrastructure and Sustainable Cities: Key Concepts and Skills. 44(3). 6 indexed citations
5.
Hollander, Rachelle D., et al.. (2013). Practical Guidance on Science and Engineering Ethics Education for Instructors and Administrators: Papers and Summary from a Workshop December 12, 2012. 7 indexed citations
6.
Davis, Michael, Marilyn A. Dyrud, Joseph R. Herkert, et al.. (2012). Engineering Ethics: Looking Back, Looking Forward. Science and Engineering Ethics. 19(3). 1395–1404. 7 indexed citations
7.
Hollander, Rachelle D., et al.. (2009). Ethics education and scientific and engineering research : what's been learned? what should be done? : summary of a workshop. Accountability in Research. 15(1). 23 indexed citations
8.
Hollander, Rachelle D.. (2002). Social genomics: Genomic inventions in society. Science and Engineering Ethics. 8(4). 485–496. 1 indexed citations
9.
Hollander, Rachelle D., et al.. (1995). Why teach ethics in science and engineering?. Science and Engineering Ethics. 1(1). 83–87. 6 indexed citations
10.
Mayo, Deborah G. & Rachelle D. Hollander. (1994). Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 144 indexed citations
11.
Hollander, Rachelle D.. (1992). On Issues of Scientific Misconduct. Knowledge. 14(2). 193–196. 1 indexed citations
12.
Hollander, Rachelle D. & Nicholas H. Steneck. (1990). Science- and Engineering-Related Ethics and Values Studies: Characteristics of an Emerging Field of Research. Science Technology & Human Values. 15(1). 84–104. 8 indexed citations
13.
Hollander, Rachelle D.. (1990). Journals Have Obligations, Too: Commentary on "Confirmational Response Bias". Science Technology & Human Values. 15(1). 46–49. 3 indexed citations
14.
Weil, Vivian & Rachelle D. Hollander. (1990). Sharing Scientific Data II: Normative Issues. IRB Ethics and Human Research. 12(2). 7–7. 7 indexed citations
15.
Hollander, Rachelle D.. (1987). Commentary: In a New Mode—Ethics and Values Studies at the NSF. Science Technology & Human Values. 12(2). 59–61. 1 indexed citations
16.
Adams, Judith E., Paul T. Durbin, & Rachelle D. Hollander. (1986). Research in Sts Studies. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society. 6(3). 246–254. 1 indexed citations
17.
Hollander, Rachelle D.. (1984). Changes in the concept of informed consent in medical encounters. Academic Medicine. 59(10). 783–8. 6 indexed citations
18.
Hollander, Rachelle D.. (1984). Information constraints in medical encounters. Journal of Medical Humanities. 5(2). 116–126. 1 indexed citations
19.
Hollander, Rachelle D., et al.. (1982). Institutionalizing Public Service Science: Its Perils and Promise. Journal of Voluntary Action Research. 11(1). 34–45. 8 indexed citations
20.
Hollander, Rachelle D.. (1976). Ecologists, Ethical Codes, and the Struggles of a New Profession. The Hastings Center Report. 6(1). 45–45. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026