Rachel Williams

3.4k citations
47 papers · 2.6k indexed · h-index 22

Rachel Williams

45 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Rachel Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 884
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 152
  • Clinical Psychology 628
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 339
Replace Éric Laurent with:
Éric Laurent France
Marcin Wojnar Poland
Andreana P. Haley United States
Kristine Erickson United States
Elizabeth Prom‐Wormley United States
S H Dinwiddie United States
Ranan Rimón Finland
Rosalind J. Neuman United States
Robert N. McLay United States
Frederick R. Snyder United States
Rachel Williams relative to Éric Laurent France Éric Laurent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Éric Laurent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Williams. The network helps show where Rachel Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rachel Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rachel Williams Line = papers co-authored together Rachel Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20232
2 201938
3 201832
4 201533
5 20157
6 201118
7
Wilson's disease: diagnosis and current treatment options
20051
8 200538
9 200425
10 200316
11
Invisible, underserved, and diverse: the health of women in prison
20022
12 20021
13 1995420
14 1995234
15 199473
16 199154
17 1991231
18 198119
19
Streptozotocin-induced pancreatic insulitis in mice. Morphologic and physiologic studies.
1978100
20 19783

About Rachel Williams

Rachel Williams is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Hematology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (7 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (6 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (3 papers), Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers) and Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.2k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (884 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (152 citations). Rachel Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Brendan P. Bradley, Karin Mogg, Andrew Mathews, David M. Clark, Maryanne Martin, Aldo A. Rossini, A. A. Like, Michael Appel, A A Rossini and Steven B. Koevary. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026