Rachel Springer

573 citations
31 papers · 366 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Rachel Springer

25 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers

Rachel Springer
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • General Health Professions 240
  • Research and Theory 8
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 29
  • Economics and Econometrics 121
  • Health Information Management 19
Replace Martha L. Sylvia with:
Martha L. Sylvia United States
Jane Merkley Canada
Elizabeth Rosted Denmark
Erin Audrey Taylor United States
Margaret Flinter United States
Jessica Esterson United States
Silke Kuske Germany
Evelyn T. Chang United States
N. Marcus Thygeson United States
Jennifer W. Thompson United States
Rachel Springer relative to Martha L. Sylvia United States Martha L. Sylvia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Martha L. Sylvia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Springer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Springer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Springer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Springer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Springer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Springer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Springer. The network helps show where Rachel Springer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rachel Springer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rachel Springer Line = papers co-authored together Rachel Springer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201875
2 201752
3 202133
4 201832
5 201828
6 202119
7 202019
8 201819
9 202015
10 201913
11 202211
12 20219
13 20228
14 20226
15 20196
16 20205
17 20244
18 20232
19 20242
20 20192

About Rachel Springer

Rachel Springer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (13 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (9 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers) and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (240 citations), Research and Theory (8 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (29 citations), Economics and Econometrics (121 citations) and Health Information Management (19 citations). Rachel Springer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, San Marino and China. Frequent co-authors include Miguel Marino, Deborah J. Cohen, Bijal A. Balasubramanian, Samuel T. Edwards, Leif I. Solberg, Jennifer E. DeVoe, Nathalie Huguet, Kurt C. Stange, William L. Miller and Heather Angier. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, The Annals of Family Medicine, Maternal and Child Health Journal, Diabetes Care and Medical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact