Rachel Pain
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.2%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 0.05%
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Urban Studies top 0.1%
- Gender Studies top 1%
- Co-authors
- Peter HopkinsKye AskinsPeter FrancisHille KoskelaLynn A. StaeheliGraham MowlCathy BaileyMike Kesby
- Topics
- Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (11 papers)Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (10 papers)Migration, Refugees, and Integration (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaEvolutionUrban Studies
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Rachel Pain
81 papers receiving 5.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Sociology and Political Science 3.8k
- Geography, Planning and Development 1.1k
- General Health Professions 1.0k
- Urban Studies 687
- Gender Studies 581
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Pain
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Pain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Pain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Pain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Pain
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Pain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Pain. The network helps show where Rachel Pain may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Pain
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Pain. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Pain based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Pain. Rachel Pain is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | Representing Slow Violence and Resistance:On Hiding and Seeing | 15 |
| 3 | 49 | |
| 4 | 161 | |
| 5 | 190 | |
| 6 | Going With the Flow: Participatory Action Research and River Catchment Management | 1 |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 251 | |
| 11 | 178 | |
| 12 | 50 | |
| 13 | 306 | |
| 14 | 316 | |
| 15 | 129 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 125 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 254 |
About Rachel Pain
Rachel Pain is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Urban Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 81 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (11 papers), Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (10 papers) and Migration, Refugees, and Integration (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (1.1k citations), Urban Studies (687 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (3.8k citations). Rachel Pain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Peter Hopkins, Kye Askins, Peter Francis, Hille Koskela, Lynn A. Staeheli, Graham Mowl, Cathy Bailey, Mike Kesby, Susan Smith and Sara Kindon. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Evolution and Urban Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.