Rachel N. Denison
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Sensory Systems top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Co-authors
- Dobromir RahnevMarisa CarrascoMichael A. SilverDavid J. HeegerWei JiElise A. PiazzaShlomit Yuval‐GreenbergWilliam T. Adler
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (19 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Rachel N. Denison
32 papers receiving 806 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Cognitive Neuroscience 691
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 190
- Social Psychology 76
- Sensory Systems 54
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 51
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel N. Denison
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel N. Denison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel N. Denison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel N. Denison more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel N. Denison
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel N. Denison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel N. Denison. The network helps show where Rachel N. Denison may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel N. Denison
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel N. Denison. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel N. Denison based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel N. Denison. Rachel N. Denison is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 68 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 51 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Rachel N. Denison
Rachel N. Denison is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sensory Systems, having authored 35 papers that have together received 816 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (22 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (19 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (691 citations), General Decision Sciences (44 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (190 citations). Rachel N. Denison has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dobromir Rahnev, Marisa Carrasco, Michael A. Silver, David J. Heeger, Wei Ji, Elise A. Piazza, Shlomit Yuval‐Greenberg, William T. Adler, Essa Yacoub and An T. Vu. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Neuron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.