Rachel Hine

4.0k citations
20 papers · 2.8k indexed · h-index 18

Rachel Hine

19 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Rachel Hine
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 676
  • Plant Science 646
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 569
  • Ecology 426
  • Environmental Chemistry 414
Replace Douglas B. Jackson‐Smith with:
Douglas B. Jackson‐Smith United States
Lois Wright Morton United States
Sarah Taylor Lovell United States
Teresa Pinto‐Correia Portugal
Annette Piorr Germany
Frank Lupi United States
Kristen C. Nelson United States
Kristin Floress United States
Stephen Hynes Ireland
Sarah P. Church United States
Rachel Hine relative to Douglas B. Jackson‐Smith United States Douglas B. Jackson‐Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Douglas B. Jackson‐Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Hine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Hine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Hine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Hine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Hine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Hine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Hine. The network helps show where Rachel Hine may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Hine

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Hine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Hine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Hine. Rachel Hine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
What care farming is
0
2 140
3 170
4
Care farming in the UK: Contexts, benefits and links with therapeutic communities
99
5
Working the land.
3
6
Care farming in the UK: Evidence and Opportunities
39
7 36
8 20
9 388
10 21
11
A countryside for health and wellbeing: the physical and mental health benefits of green exercise.
45
12 386
13 39
14 32
15 304
16 286
17 187
18 161
19 34
20 400

About Rachel Hine

Rachel Hine is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban Green Space and Health (6 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (676 citations), Environmental Chemistry (414 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (569 citations). Rachel Hine has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jules Pretty, James Morison, Jo Peacock, Matthew Rayment, M. H. Sellens, Mitch Griffin, Nigel South, David Gee, Déborah Bossio and F.W.T. Penning de Vries. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment and Agricultural Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026