Jane Dixon

5.9k total citations
116 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Jane Dixon is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Plant Science and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Dixon has authored 116 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in General Health Professions, 24 papers in Plant Science and 18 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in Jane Dixon's work include Organic Food and Agriculture (17 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (14 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (13 papers). Jane Dixon is often cited by papers focused on Organic Food and Agriculture (17 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (14 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (13 papers). Jane Dixon collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Thailand and United Kingdom. Jane Dixon's co-authors include Cathy Banwell, Nicky Welch, Bram Govaerts, A. Castellanos-Navarrete, Luc Dendooven, K. D. Sayre, Nele Verhulst, Jules Pretty, F.W.T. Penning de Vries and James Morison and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Environmental Science & Technology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Jane Dixon

110 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Dixon Australia 35 871 642 606 528 419 116 3.7k
Andrew D. Jones United States 37 763 0.9× 1.8k 2.7× 696 1.1× 718 1.4× 354 0.8× 139 5.5k
Steven T. Yen United States 38 460 0.5× 678 1.1× 461 0.8× 1.0k 2.0× 269 0.6× 160 4.4k
Meredith T. Niles United States 31 683 0.8× 619 1.0× 666 1.1× 284 0.5× 435 1.0× 122 4.0k
Martin W. Bloem United States 45 601 0.7× 1.7k 2.7× 278 0.5× 1.1k 2.0× 218 0.5× 135 6.9k
Lois Wright Morton United States 30 772 0.9× 402 0.6× 750 1.2× 198 0.4× 279 0.7× 106 3.6k
Per Pinstrup‐Andersen United States 32 771 0.9× 1.0k 1.6× 776 1.3× 304 0.6× 485 1.2× 128 4.3k
Bhavani Shankar United Kingdom 30 480 0.6× 490 0.8× 460 0.8× 986 1.9× 194 0.5× 111 3.0k
Saskia de Pee United States 43 538 0.6× 1.9k 2.9× 234 0.4× 1.1k 2.1× 140 0.3× 161 7.1k
Derek Headey United States 45 476 0.5× 1.6k 2.5× 1.2k 2.0× 793 1.5× 1.2k 2.8× 132 7.1k
Suneetha Kadiyala United Kingdom 30 311 0.4× 1.4k 2.3× 272 0.4× 596 1.1× 183 0.4× 111 3.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Dixon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Dixon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Dixon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Dixon. The network helps show where Jane Dixon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Dixon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Dixon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Dixon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Dixon. Jane Dixon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moberg, Emily, Edward H. Allison, Maya Almaraz, et al.. (2021). Combined innovations in public policy, the private sector and culture can drive sustainability transitions in food systems. Nature Food. 2(4). 282–290. 35 indexed citations
2.
Dixon, Jane, et al.. (2019). Flexible employment policies, temporal control and health promoting practices: A qualitative study in two Australian worksites. PLoS ONE. 14(12). e0224542–e0224542. 14 indexed citations
3.
Dixon, Jane, et al.. (2017). Early Childhood Education and Care Workers and Wellbeing in a Continuous Caring Regime. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 42(3). 46–62. 3 indexed citations
4.
Sargent, Ginny, Cathy Banwell, Lyndall Strazdins, & Jane Dixon. (2016). Time and participation in workplace health promotion: Australian qualitative study. Health Promotion International. 33(3). daw078–daw078. 25 indexed citations
5.
Yiengprugsawan, Vasoontara, et al.. (2015). Health, Happiness and Eating Together: What Can a Large Thai Cohort Study Tell Us?. Global Journal of Health Science. 7(4). 270–7. 44 indexed citations
6.
Dixon, Jane & Carol Richards. (2015). On food security and alternative food networks: understanding and performing food security in the context of urban bias. Agriculture and Human Values. 33(1). 191–202. 2 indexed citations
7.
Dixon, Jane, Dan Woodman, Lyndall Strazdins, et al.. (2013). Flexible employment, flexible eating and health risks. Critical Public Health. 24(4). 461–475. 30 indexed citations
8.
Butler, Colin D. & Jane Dixon. (2012). Plentiful food? Nutritious food?. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 112–127. 3 indexed citations
9.
Dixon, Jane, et al.. (2010). Fresh market to supermarket: nutrition transition insights from Chiang Mai, Thailand. Public Health Nutrition. 13(6). 893–897. 10 indexed citations
10.
Banwell, Cathy, et al.. (2009). BMI and health-related behaviors in a national cohort of 87,134 Thai Open University students. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1 indexed citations
11.
Waddington, S.R., et al.. (2009). Maize-rice cropping systems in Bangladesh: Status and research needs. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 3(6). 35–53. 35 indexed citations
12.
Govaerts, Bram, Nele Verhulst, A. Castellanos-Navarrete, et al.. (2009). Conservation Agriculture and Soil Carbon Sequestration: Between Myth and Farmer Reality. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 28(3). 97–122. 380 indexed citations
13.
Broom, Dorothy H. & Jane Dixon. (2008). The Sex of Slimming: Mobilizing Gender in Weight-loss Programmes and Fat Acceptance. Social Theory & Health. 6(2). 148–166. 9 indexed citations
14.
Dixon, Jane, Kerrie Brïdson, Jody Evans, & Michael Morrison. (2005). An alternative perspective on relationships, loyalty and future store choice. The International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research. 15(4). 351–374. 38 indexed citations
15.
Banwell, Cathy, et al.. (2005). Reflections on expert consensus: a case study of the social trends contributing to obesity. European Journal of Public Health. 15(6). 564–568. 62 indexed citations
16.
Dixon, Jane, et al.. (2003). Community Practice in Australia. 2 indexed citations
17.
Burgess, John & Jane Dixon. (1998). The political economy of microeconomic reform in the Australian chicken meat industry. Journal of Australian political economy. 104. 2 indexed citations
18.
Pearson, Craig J., David W. Norman, & Jane Dixon. (1995). Sustainable dryland cropping in relation to soil productivity. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 17 indexed citations
19.
Upton, Martin & Jane Dixon. (1994). Methods of micro-level analysis for agricultural programmes and policies : a guideline for policy analysts. FAO eBooks. 1 indexed citations
20.
Dixon, Jane, et al.. (1994). Farm and community information use for agricultural programmes and policies. FAO eBooks. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026