Rachel Gage

445 citations
17 papers · 256 indexed · h-index 10
Topics
Tactile and Sensory Interactions (12 papers)Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers)

In The Last Decade

Rachel Gage

15 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

Rachel Gage
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 187
  • Epidemiology 63
  • Human-Computer Interaction 63
  • Automotive Engineering 56
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 39
Replace Jeffrey R. Blum with:
Jeffrey R. Blum Canada
Alessia Tonelli Italy
Bineeth Kuriakose Norway
Seita Kayukawa Japan
Mahya Beheshti United States
Matthias Rötting Germany
María Ángeles Espinosa Spain
Georgios K. Kountouriotis United Kingdom
Philippe Truillet France
Bernard Oriola France
Rachel Gage relative to Jeffrey R. Blum Canada Jeffrey R. Blum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Jeffrey R. Blum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Gage

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Gage's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Gage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Gage more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Gage

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Gage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Gage. The network helps show where Rachel Gage may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Gage

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Gage. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Gage based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Gage. Rachel Gage is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 0
3
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social isolation in older adults with sensory loss
0
4 29
5 2
6 11
7
Surveying the digital reading behavior of people with low vision
1
8 4
9 12
10 20
11 14
12 10
13 66
14 25
15 30
16 29
17
Visual Accessibility of Ramps and Steps
2

About Rachel Gage

Rachel Gage is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 17 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (12 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (63 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (187 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (12 citations). Rachel Gage has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Gordon E. Legge, Christopher S. Kallie, K. Kramer, Muzi Chen, Bosco S. Tjan, Michael D. Crossland, Sandra R. Montezuma, Tu M. Tran, Susan Sun and Yingchen He. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and British Journal of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026