Rachel Barkan

1.6k total citations
22 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Rachel Barkan is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Decision Sciences and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Barkan has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in General Decision Sciences and 6 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Rachel Barkan's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers). Rachel Barkan is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers). Rachel Barkan collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United States and Netherlands. Rachel Barkan's co-authors include Shahar Ayal, Francesca Gino, Dan Ariely, Shaul Shalvi, Jerome R. Busemeyer, Aviad A. Israeli, Sheldon Danziger, Ido Erev, Xuyang Li and Alok Chaturvedi and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Barkan

22 papers receiving 980 citations

Peers

Rachel Barkan

CN

SPS

SR

SP

GDS

Briony D. Pulford United Kingdom

Detlef Fetchenhauer Germany

James Friedrich United States

Steven M. Samuels United States

Daniel M. Bartels United States

Gari Walkowitz Germany

Rumen Iliev United States

Jonathan Z. Berman United States

Gilad Feldman Hong Kong

Clayton R. Critcher United States

Briony D. Pulford United Kingdom

Rachel Barkan

240 ×0.6

CN

355 ×0.9

SPS

294 ×0.9

SR

276 ×1.2

SP

197 ×0.9

GDS

Citations per year, relative to Rachel Barkan Rachel Barkan (= 1×) peers Briony D. Pulford

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Barkan

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Barkan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Barkan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Barkan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Barkan

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Barkan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Barkan. The network helps show where Rachel Barkan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Barkan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Barkan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Barkan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Barkan. Rachel Barkan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Teodorescu, Kinneret, Ori Plonsky, Shahar Ayal, & Rachel Barkan. (2021). Frequency of enforcement is more important than the severity of punishment in reducing violation behaviors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118(42). 16 indexed citations

2.

Barkan, Rachel, Sheldon Danziger, & Yaniv Shani. (2016). Do as I say, not as I do: Choice–advice differences in decisions to learn information. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 125. 57–66. 14 indexed citations

3.

Barkan, Rachel, et al.. (2016). One-by-One or All-at-Once? Self-Reporting Policies and Dishonesty. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 113–113. 2 indexed citations

4.

Barkan, Rachel, Shahar Ayal, & Dan Ariely. (2016). Revisiting constructed preferences: Extrapolating preferences from relevant reminders.. Decision. 3(4). 281–294. 3 indexed citations

5.

Ayal, Shahar, Francesca Gino, Rachel Barkan, & Dan Ariely. (2015). Three Principles to REVISE People’s Unethical Behavior. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 10(6). 738–741. 94 indexed citations

6.

Barkan, Rachel, Shahar Ayal, & Dan Ariely. (2015). Ethical dissonance, justifications, and moral behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology. 6. 157–161. 107 indexed citations

7.

Shalvi, Shaul, Francesca Gino, Rachel Barkan, & Shahar Ayal. (2015). Self-Serving Justifications. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 24(2). 125–130. 293 indexed citations

8.

Barkan, Rachel, Shahar Ayal, Francesca Gino, & Dan Ariely. (2012). The pot calling the kettle black: Distancing response to ethical dissonance.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 141(4). 757–773. 122 indexed citations

9.

Danziger, Sheldon, et al.. (2012). Idealistic advice and pragmatic choice: A psychological distance account.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 102(6). 1105–1117. 69 indexed citations

10.

Busemeyer, Jerome R., et al.. (2007). Context effects and models of preferential choice: implications for consumer behavior. Marketing Theory. 7(1). 39–58. 18 indexed citations

11.

Barkan, Rachel, et al.. (2005). Framing reference points: the effect of integration and segregation on dynamic inconsistency. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 18(3). 213–226. 13 indexed citations

12.

Israeli, Aviad A. & Rachel Barkan. (2004). Developing a framework for rewards in combined production/service businesses. International Journal of Service Industry Management. 15(5). 444–459. 19 indexed citations

13.

Barkan, Rachel, et al.. (2004). Tip Policy, Visibility and Quality of Service in Cafés. Tourism Economics. 10(4). 449–464. 15 indexed citations

14.

Israeli, Aviad A. & Rachel Barkan. (2004). The Impact of Hotel Social Events on Employee Satisfaction. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism. 2(2). 23–39. 7 indexed citations

15.

Barkan, Rachel & Jerome R. Busemeyer. (2003). Modeling dynamic inconsistency with a changing reference point. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 16(4). 235–255. 37 indexed citations

16.

Barkan, Rachel. (2002). Using a signal detection safety model to simulate managerial expectations and supervisory feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 89(2). 1005–1031. 9 indexed citations

17.

Busemeyer, Jerome R., et al.. (2000). Dynamic and consequential consistency of choices between paths of decision trees.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 129(4). 530–545. 34 indexed citations

18.

Busemeyer, Jerome R., et al.. (2000). Dynamic and consequential consistency of choices between paths of decision trees.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 129(4). 530–545. 33 indexed citations

19.

Barkan, Rachel & Jerome R. Busemeyer. (1999). Changing plans: Dynamic inconsistency and the effect of experience on the reference point. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 6(4). 547–554. 40 indexed citations

20.

Barkan, Rachel, et al.. (1998). Accidents and Decision Making under Uncertainty: A Comparison of Four Models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 74(2). 118–144. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact