Rachel Andrew

1.7k total citations
25 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Rachel Andrew is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Andrew has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Rachel Andrew's work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (4 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers). Rachel Andrew is often cited by papers focused on Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (4 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers). Rachel Andrew collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Denmark. Rachel Andrew's co-authors include Marika Tiggemann, Levina Clark, Nihal de Lanerolle, Oliver Braddick, Shirley Anker, John Wattam-Bell, Janette Atkinson, Fleur Braddick, Adrian Furnham and Lilly Dubowitz and has published in prestigious journals such as Developmental Psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Journal of Adolescent Health.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Andrew

25 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Rachel Andrew

CP

CN

SP

DN

PHARM

Peter R. Saunders United Kingdom

Marsha Kaitz Israel

Giampiero Bartolucci Canada

Eloise Stark United Kingdom

Kate Woodcock United Kingdom

Frances Degen Horowitz United States

Peter M. Vietze United States

Elizabeth A. Wehner United States

Sarah E. Fine United States

Marta Borgi Italy

Peter R. Saunders United Kingdom

Rachel Andrew

458 ×0.8

CP

54 ×0.3

CN

272 ×1.5

SP

32 ×0.2

DN

9 ×0.1

PHARM

Citations per year, relative to Rachel Andrew Rachel Andrew (= 1×) peers Peter R. Saunders

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Andrew

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Andrew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Andrew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Andrew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Andrew

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Andrew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Andrew. The network helps show where Rachel Andrew may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Andrew

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Andrew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Andrew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Andrew. Rachel Andrew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Hughes, Karen, Mark A Bellis, Dinesh Sethi, et al.. (2019). Adverse childhood experiences, childhood relationships and associated substance use and mental health in young Europeans. European Journal of Public Health. 29(4). 741–747. 69 indexed citations

2.

Andrew, Rachel, Marika Tiggemann, & Levina Clark. (2016). Predictors and health-related outcomes of positive body image in adolescent girls: A prospective study.. Developmental Psychology. 52(3). 463–474. 132 indexed citations

3.

Andrew, Rachel, Marika Tiggemann, & Levina Clark. (2016). Predicting body appreciation in young women: An integrated model of positive body image. Body Image. 18. 34–42. 77 indexed citations

4.

Andrew, Rachel, Marika Tiggemann, & Levina Clark. (2015). The protective role of body appreciation against media-induced body dissatisfaction. Body Image. 15. 98–104. 124 indexed citations

5.

Andrew, Rachel, Marika Tiggemann, & Levina Clark. (2015). Predictors of Intuitive Eating in Adolescent Girls. Journal of Adolescent Health. 56(2). 209–214. 44 indexed citations

6.

Andrew, Rachel, Marika Tiggemann, & Levina Clark. (2015). Can body appreciation protect against media-induced body dissatisfaction?. Journal of Eating Disorders. 3(S1). 1 indexed citations

7.

Andrew, Rachel, Marika Tiggemann, & Levina Clark. (2014). Positive body image and young women’s health: Implications for sun protection, cancer screening, weight loss and alcohol consumption behaviours. Journal of Health Psychology. 21(1). 28–39. 136 indexed citations

8.

Andrew, Rachel, Marika Tiggemann, & Levina Clark. (2013). Self-compassion and positive body image: a role for social comparison?. Journal of Eating Disorders. 1(S1). 2 indexed citations

9.

Tiggemann, Marika & Rachel Andrew. (2012). Clothing choices, weight, and trait self-objectification. Body Image. 9(3). 409–412. 30 indexed citations

10.

Roche, Ann, et al.. (2012). Alcohol and young people: What the legislation says about access and secondary supply. Drug and Alcohol Review. 32(2). 124–132. 19 indexed citations

11.

Tiggemann, Marika & Rachel Andrew. (2011). Clothes Make a Difference: The Role of Self-Objectification. Sex Roles. 66(9-10). 646–654. 42 indexed citations

12.

Atkinson, Janette, Oliver Braddick, Shirley Anker, et al.. (2003). Neurobiological Models of Visuospatial Cognition in Children With Williams Syndrome: Measures of Dorsal-Stream and Frontal Function. Developmental Neuropsychology. 23(1). 139–172. 72 indexed citations

13.

Atkinson, Janette, Oliver Braddick, Shirley Anker, et al.. (2003). Neurobiological Models of Visuospatial Cognition in Children With Williams Syndrome: Measures of Dorsal-Stream and Frontal Function. Developmental Neuropsychology. 23(1-2). 139–172. 167 indexed citations

14.

Haataja, Leena, Andrea Guzzetta, Shirley Anker, et al.. (1999). Visual function in term infants with hypoxic-ischaemic insults: correlation with neurodevelopment at 2 years of age. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal. 80(2). F99–F104. 67 indexed citations

15.

Curran, William J., Oliver Braddick, Janette Atkinson, John Wattam-Bell, & Rachel Andrew. (1999). Development of Illusory-Contour Perception in Infants. Perception. 28(4). 527–538. 29 indexed citations

16.

Mercuri, Eugenio, Oliver Braddick, Janette Atkinson, et al.. (1998). Orientation - Reversal and Phase - Reversal Visual Evoked Potentials in Full - Term Infants with Brain Lesions: A Longitudinal Study. Neuropediatrics. 29(4). 169–174. 18 indexed citations

17.

Furnham, Adrian & Rachel Andrew. (1996). A Cross-Cultural Study of Attitudes towards Seeking Psychological Help. Psychological Reports. 79(1). 289–290. 18 indexed citations

18.

Andrew, Rachel. (1974). Changes in Visual Responsiveness following Intercollicular Lesions and their Effects on Avoidance and Attack. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 10(4-5). 400–424. 17 indexed citations

19.

Andrew, Rachel & Nihal de Lanerolle. (1974). The Effects of Muting Lesions on Emotional Behaviour and Behaviour Normally Associated with Calling. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 10(4-5). 377–399. 37 indexed citations

20.

Andrew, Rachel. (1973). The Evocation of Calls by Diencephalic Stimulation in the Conscious Chick. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 7(6). 424–446. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact