Rachael Winfree
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.01%
- Insect Science top 0.01%
- Plant Science top 0.1%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.1%
- Genetics top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- Claire KremenNeal M. WilliamsJeff OllertonSam TarrantSarah S. GreenleafDaniel P. CariveauÍgnasi BartomeusMarcelo A. Aizen
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (62 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (42 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (31 papers)
- Cited by
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsInsect ScienceNature and Landscape Conservation
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaArgentina
In The Last Decade
Rachael Winfree
65 papers receiving 12.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 11.5k
- Insect Science 7.0k
- Plant Science 5.7k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 4.1k
- Genetics 3.7k
Countries citing papers authored by Rachael Winfree
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachael Winfree's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachael Winfree with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachael Winfree more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachael Winfree
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachael Winfree. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachael Winfree. The network helps show where Rachael Winfree may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachael Winfree
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachael Winfree. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachael Winfree based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachael Winfree. Rachael Winfree is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 82 | |
| 10 | 42 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | Species turnover promotes the importance of bee diversity for crop pollination at regional scalesbreakdown → | 217 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 191 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | 155 | |
| 17 | 205 | |
| 18 | 41 | |
| 19 | A Monte Carlo model for estimating the productivity of a generalist brood parasite across multiple host species. | 4 |
| 20 | 72 |
About Rachael Winfree
Rachael Winfree is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 67 papers that have together received 13.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (62 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (42 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (31 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (11.5k citations), Insect Science (7.0k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (4.1k citations). Rachael Winfree has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Claire Kremen, Neal M. Williams, Jeff Ollerton, Sam Tarrant, Sarah S. Greenleaf, Daniel P. Cariveau, Ígnasi Bartomeus, Marcelo A. Aizen, Jason Gibbs and Diego P. Vázquez. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.