Countries citing papers authored by Rachael Petersen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachael Petersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachael Petersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachael Petersen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachael Petersen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachael Petersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachael Petersen. The network helps show where Rachael Petersen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachael Petersen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachael Petersen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachael Petersen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rachael Petersen. Rachael Petersen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wheeler, David, Brookie Guzder-Williams, Rachael Petersen, & David Thau. (2018). Rapid MODIS-based detection of tree cover loss. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 69. 78–87.9 indexed citations
Harris, Nancy L., et al.. (2018). Comparing Global and National Approaches to Estimating Deforestation Rates in REDD+ Countries.2 indexed citations
5.
Petersen, Rachael, Crystal Davis, Martin Herold, & Veronique De Sy. (2018). Ending Tropical Deforestation: Tropical Forest Monitoring: Exploring the Gaps Between What is Required and What is Possible for REDD+ and Other Initiatives.1 indexed citations
6.
Petersen, Rachael, Crystal Davis, Martin Herold, & Veronique De Sy. (2018). Tropical Forest Monitoring: Exploring the Gaps Between What is Required and What is Possible for REDD+ and Other Initiatives. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).3 indexed citations
7.
Weisse, Mikaela, et al.. (2017). Places to Watch: Identifying High-Priority Forest Disturbance from Near–Real Time Satellite Data.3 indexed citations
8.
Petersen, Rachael & Lilian Pintea. (2017). Forest Watcher Brings Data Straight to Environmental Defenders.5 indexed citations
9.
Petersen, Rachael, et al.. (2017). Logging, Mining, And Agricultural Concessions Data Transparency: A Survey Of 14 Forested Countries.3 indexed citations
10.
Petersen, Rachael, Elizabeth Dow Goldman, Nancy L. Harris, et al.. (2016). Mapping Tree Plantations with Multispectral Imagery: Preliminary Results for Seven Tropical Countries.46 indexed citations
11.
Sizer, Nigel, Rachael Petersen, James H. Anderson, & Matt Hansen. (2015). Tree Cover Loss Spikes in Russia and Canada, Remains High Globally.2 indexed citations
12.
Petersen, Rachael, Nigel Sizer, Matt Hansen, & Peter Potapov. (2015). Satellites Uncover 5 Surprising Hotspots for Tree Cover Loss.4 indexed citations
13.
Weisse, Mikaela & Rachael Petersen. (2015). Brazil and Indonesia Struggling to Reduce Deforestation.2 indexed citations
14.
Petersen, Rachael & Nigel Sizer. (2014). Tar Sands Threaten World’s Largest Boreal Forest.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.