R.A. Schipper

670 total citations
28 papers, 390 citations indexed

About

R.A. Schipper is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Environmental Chemistry and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, R.A. Schipper has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 390 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 5 papers in Environmental Chemistry and 5 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in R.A. Schipper's work include Agricultural Economics and Policy (7 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (6 papers) and Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis (5 papers). R.A. Schipper is often cited by papers focused on Agricultural Economics and Policy (7 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (6 papers) and Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis (5 papers). R.A. Schipper collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, India and Philippines. R.A. Schipper's co-authors include D.M. Jansen, J.J. Stoorvogel, Hans Jansen, H. van Keulen, H. Hengsdijk, B.A.M. Bouman, Daan van Soest, Ousmane Coulibaly, Ezra Berkhout and G. Cornelis van Kooten and has published in prestigious journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Ecological Modelling and American Journal of Agricultural Economics.

In The Last Decade

R.A. Schipper

26 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R.A. Schipper Netherlands 13 158 118 89 75 75 28 390
Dang Dinh Quang France 8 110 0.7× 233 2.0× 77 0.9× 79 1.1× 33 0.4× 17 424
N. Turpin France 9 89 0.6× 93 0.8× 52 0.6× 42 0.6× 92 1.2× 22 472
Mongi Sghaïer Tunisia 7 87 0.6× 165 1.4× 55 0.6× 98 1.3× 41 0.5× 37 399
Seema Purushothaman India 11 118 0.7× 214 1.8× 48 0.5× 89 1.2× 52 0.7× 34 505
Amaia Albizua Spain 10 143 0.9× 121 1.0× 42 0.5× 45 0.6× 55 0.7× 19 368
Klaus Droppelmann United States 13 200 1.3× 101 0.9× 143 1.6× 51 0.7× 90 1.2× 19 489
Sami Myyrä Finland 11 241 1.5× 88 0.7× 203 2.3× 32 0.4× 142 1.9× 45 414
Raffaele Cortignani Italy 16 205 1.3× 103 0.9× 134 1.5× 29 0.4× 108 1.4× 34 598
Yingqian Huang China 7 140 0.9× 103 0.9× 90 1.0× 66 0.9× 49 0.7× 10 370
Marita Laukkanen Finland 13 107 0.7× 105 0.9× 87 1.0× 35 0.5× 167 2.2× 27 463

Countries citing papers authored by R.A. Schipper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.A. Schipper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.A. Schipper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.A. Schipper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.A. Schipper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.A. Schipper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.A. Schipper. The network helps show where R.A. Schipper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R.A. Schipper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R.A. Schipper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R.A. Schipper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R.A. Schipper. R.A. Schipper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Berkhout, Ezra, R.A. Schipper, A. Kuyvenhoven, & Ousmane Coulibaly. (2010). Does heterogeneity in goals and preferences affect efficiency? A case study of farm households in northern Nigeria. Agricultural Economics. 41(3-4). 265–273. 26 indexed citations
3.
Berkhout, Ezra, R.A. Schipper, H. van Keulen, & Ousmane Coulibaly. (2010). Heterogeneity in farmers’ production decisions and its impact on soil nutrient use: Results and implications from northern Nigeria. Agricultural Systems. 104(1). 63–74. 22 indexed citations
4.
Schipper, R.A., et al.. (2010). Space and economics. 15 indexed citations
5.
Laborte, Alice G., R.A. Schipper, M.K. van Ittersum, et al.. (2009). Farmers' welfare, food production and the environment: a model-based assessment of the effects of new technologies in the northern Philippines. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 56(4). 345–373. 26 indexed citations
6.
Sáenz-Ségura, Fernando, Marijke D’Haese, & R.A. Schipper. (2009). A seasonal model of contracts between a monopsonistic processor and smallholder pepper producers in Costa Rica. Agricultural Systems. 103(1). 10–20. 4 indexed citations
7.
Jansen, Hans, et al.. (2005). An interdisciplinary approach to regional land use analysis using GIS, with applications to the Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica. Agricultural Economics. 32(1). 87–104. 9 indexed citations
8.
Jansen, Hans, Amy Damon, John Pender, W.G. Wielemaker, & R.A. Schipper. (2003). Sustainable development in the Hillsides of Honduras: A livelihoods approach. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 3 indexed citations
9.
Bulte, Erwin, Daan van Soest, G. Cornelis van Kooten, & R.A. Schipper. (2002). Forest Conservation in Costa Rica when Nonuse Benefits are Uncertain but Rising. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 84(1). 150–160. 46 indexed citations
10.
Bouman, B.A.M., Reimund P. Rötter, R.A. Schipper, & Alice G. Laborte. (2000). Regional Land Use Analysis to Support Agricultural and Environmental Policy Formulation. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 471–488. 1 indexed citations
11.
Bouman, B.A.M., et al.. (2000). Tools for Land Use Analysis on Different Scales : With Case Studies for Costa Rica. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 21 indexed citations
12.
Sáenz-Ségura, Fernando, et al.. (1999). Analisis del efecto de politicas agricolas sobre el uso de la cuenca del rio Aranjuez. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 1 indexed citations
13.
Bouman, B.A.M., et al.. (1998). An integrated methodology for sustainable land use exploration using GIS. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 230–237. 3 indexed citations
14.
Jansen, D.M. & R.A. Schipper. (1995). A static, descriptive approach to quantify land use systems. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science. 43(1). 31–46. 12 indexed citations
15.
Schipper, R.A., D.M. Jansen, & J.J. Stoorvogel. (1995). Sub-regional linear programming models in land use analysis: a case study of the Neguev settlement, Costa Rica. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science. 43(1). 83–109. 20 indexed citations
16.
Bouma, J., L.O. Fresco, D.M. Jansen, et al.. (1994). Sustainable land use planning in Costa Rica: a methodological case study on farm and regional level.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 183–202. 10 indexed citations
17.
Erenstein, Olaf & R.A. Schipper. (1993). Linear programming and land use planning: a case study of Matara district, Sri Lanka.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 4 indexed citations
18.
Erenstein, Olaf & R.A. Schipper. (1992). Land use planning : an application of multilevel and multicriteria linear programming models : draft. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 1 indexed citations
19.
Fresco, L.O., et al.. (1988). Land evaluation and farming systems analysis for land use planning. (3rd ed.). Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 43 indexed citations
20.
Schipper, R.A., et al.. (1988). Evaluation of development policies using integrated bio-economic land use models: applications to Costa Rica. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026