R W Burnett

1.4k citations
44 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 17

R W Burnett

42 papers receiving 962 citations

Peers

R W Burnett
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Nephrology 196
  • Bioengineering 132
  • Electrochemistry 101
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 145
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 61
Replace Anthony O. Okorodudu with:
Anthony O. Okorodudu United States
Karl‐Siegfried Boos Germany
Don Farthing United States
Oliver Yoa‐Pu Hu Taiwan
Sihe Wang United States
Frank A. Sedor United States
Elizabeth L. Frank United States
Sanford Bolton United States
Ronald D. Schoenwald United States
George F. Johnson United States
R W Burnett relative to Anthony O. Okorodudu United States Anthony O. Okorodudu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Anthony O. Okorodudu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R W Burnett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R W Burnett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R W Burnett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R W Burnett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R W Burnett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R W Burnett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R W Burnett. The network helps show where R W Burnett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R W Burnett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R W Burnett Line = papers co-authored together R W Burnett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200935
2 200618
3 2006114
4
Approved IFCC recommendation on reporting results for blood glucose 1)
20063
5 200515
6 20022
7 200070
8 200035
9 200063
10
Approved IFCC recommendations on whole blood sampling, transport and storage for simultaneous determination of pH, blood gases and electrolytes
199532
11
International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC). Scientific Division. Committee on pH, Blood Gases and Electrolytes. Guidelines for transcutaneous PO2 and PCO2 measurement.
19904
12 199014
13 19896
14 19899
15 198210
16 19811
17 198013
18 197214
19 19724
20 196863

About R W Burnett

R W Burnett is a scholar working on Nephrology, Bioengineering and Filtration and Separation, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal function and acid-base balance (22 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (13 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (8 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (7 papers), Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (6 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (4 papers), Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (4 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (196 citations), Bioengineering (132 citations) and Electrochemistry (101 citations). R W Burnett has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Noonan, Anton Maas, Niels Fogh‐Andersen, Andrzej Lewenstam, A. L. Underwood, James O. Westgard, Wolf Rüdiger Külpmann, O Müller-Plathe, W. G. Zijlstra and A. K. Covington. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Bioresource Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026