R. Testa

47 papers receiving 853 citations

Peers

R. Testa
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Urology 251
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 187
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 200
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 59
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 186
Replace Tsuyoshi Ohmura with:
Tsuyoshi Ohmura Japan
Masashi Ukai Japan
Michael E. Brune United States
Marie-Jeanne Mathy Netherlands
Robert M. Wallis United Kingdom
Kansu Büyükafşar Türkiye
Argentina Fernández Spain
B Astruc France
Philip G. Baer United States
José M. La Fuente Portugal
R. Testa relative to Tsuyoshi Ohmura Japan Tsuyoshi Ohmura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Tsuyoshi Ohmura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Testa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Testa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Testa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Testa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Testa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Testa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Testa. The network helps show where R. Testa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. Testa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Testa Line = papers co-authored together R. Testa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997123
2 199998
3 200650
4 200047
5 199647
6 199746
7 199642
8 199736
9 199531
10
Pharmacological in vitro studies of the new 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium antagonist lercanidipine.
199630
11 199927
12 200125
13 200323
14 200523
15 199723
16 199118
17 199718
18
Antihypertensive effects of lercanidipine in experimental hypertensive rats and dogs.
199617
19 199717
20 199116

About R. Testa

R. Testa is a scholar working on Urology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Gastroenterology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 908 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (5 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (251 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (187 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (200 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (59 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (186 citations). R. Testa has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Czechia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Amedeo Leonardi, L. Guarneri, Patrizia Angelico, Elena Poggesi, Carlo Taddei, Giorgio Sironi, C. Velasco, A. Sartani, J. Paul Hieble and Diane P. Naselsky. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Pharmacological Research, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and British Journal of Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026