R. Schulten
- Materials Chemistry
- Aerospace Engineering top 10%
- Mechanical Engineering
- Catalysis top 10%
- Computational Mechanics
- Co-authors
- Kurt KugelerMichael OertelH. NickelW. J. QuadakkersK. BongartzR. HeckerWolfgang KrögerLaurent Valette
- Topics
- Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (13 papers)Nuclear Materials and Properties (8 papers)Catalysts for Methane Reforming (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
R. Schulten
27 papers receiving 289 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Materials Chemistry 182
- Aerospace Engineering 126
- Mechanical Engineering 106
- Catalysis 82
- Computational Mechanics 39
Countries citing papers authored by R. Schulten
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Schulten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Schulten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Schulten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Schulten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Schulten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Schulten. The network helps show where R. Schulten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Schulten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Schulten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Schulten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Schulten. R. Schulten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 45 | |
| 4 | 95 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | Closed Thorium Cycles in the Pebble Bed HTR | 3 |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | Coal gasification and other nuclear process heat applications | 1 |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | SURVEY OF F.R.G.: STATUS OF THTR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME. | 1 |
| 18 | DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OF A PEBBLE-BED POWER REACTOR | 2 |
| 19 | THE BROWN BOVERI-KRUPP HIGH-TEMPERATURE GAS-COOLED REACTOR | 1 |
| 20 | HOW REACTOR TEMPERATURE AND POWER VARY WITH REACTIVITY AND COOLING | 0 |
About R. Schulten
R. Schulten is a scholar working on Catalysis, Energy Engineering and Power Technology and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 31 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (13 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (8 papers) and Catalysts for Methane Reforming (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (82 citations), Aerospace Engineering (126 citations) and Materials Chemistry (182 citations). R. Schulten has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kurt Kugeler, Michael Oertel, H. Nickel, W. J. Quadakkers, K. Bongartz, R. Hecker, Wolfgang Kröger, Laurent Valette, Hans‐Werner Schmidt and Markus F. Oertel. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Metallurgical Transactions A and CORROSION.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.