R. Schneider

1.3k total citations
50 papers, 831 citations indexed

About

R. Schneider is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, R. Schneider has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 831 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 17 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 13 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in R. Schneider's work include Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (15 papers), Shape Memory Alloy Transformations (10 papers) and Magnetic Properties of Alloys (7 papers). R. Schneider is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (15 papers), Shape Memory Alloy Transformations (10 papers) and Magnetic Properties of Alloys (7 papers). R. Schneider collaborates with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. R. Schneider's co-authors include Markus Schneider, D. Hohlwein, Peter Müllner, Markus Chmielus, R. Przeniosło, I. Sosnowska, J.-U. Hoffmann, Katharina Rolfs, Robert C. Wimpory and E. Spamer and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Journal of Applied Physics.

In The Last Decade

R. Schneider

50 papers receiving 804 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. Schneider Germany 19 308 289 274 183 159 50 831
H. Brändle Switzerland 14 331 1.1× 327 1.1× 132 0.5× 545 3.0× 215 1.4× 28 1.1k
M. Ogura Japan 17 713 2.3× 673 2.3× 110 0.4× 182 1.0× 168 1.1× 70 1.1k
P. Frings Netherlands 21 341 1.1× 647 2.2× 99 0.4× 302 1.7× 970 6.1× 82 1.5k
R. C. Hazelton United States 12 158 0.5× 279 1.0× 102 0.4× 288 1.6× 105 0.7× 49 637
Rintaro Katano Japan 16 204 0.7× 83 0.3× 62 0.2× 282 1.5× 152 1.0× 48 597
A. Fisher United States 13 442 1.4× 98 0.3× 95 0.3× 329 1.8× 43 0.3× 69 958
Thomas Adam United States 20 275 0.9× 85 0.3× 155 0.6× 637 3.5× 86 0.5× 87 1.5k
M. Busch Germany 16 189 0.6× 45 0.2× 118 0.4× 378 2.1× 133 0.8× 101 753
M. Chiwaki Japan 15 195 0.6× 81 0.3× 155 0.6× 224 1.2× 26 0.2× 47 777
Teck‐Yong Tou Malaysia 15 407 1.3× 87 0.3× 219 0.8× 187 1.0× 23 0.1× 91 991

Countries citing papers authored by R. Schneider

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Schneider's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Schneider with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Schneider more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Schneider

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Schneider. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Schneider. The network helps show where R. Schneider may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Schneider

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Schneider. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Schneider based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Schneider. R. Schneider is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rolfs, Katharina, Markus Chmielus, Robert C. Wimpory, et al.. (2012). Key Properties of NiMnGa Based Single Crystals Grown with the SLARE Technique. Advanced Engineering Materials. 14(8). 614–635. 12 indexed citations
2.
Chmielus, Markus, et al.. (2010). Magnetic, mechanical and fatigue properties of a Ni45.4Mn29.1Ga21.6Fe3.9 single crystal. Scripta Materialia. 62(11). 875–878. 13 indexed citations
3.
Chmielus, Markus, Katharina Rolfs, Robert C. Wimpory, et al.. (2010). Effects of surface roughness and training on the twinning stress of Ni–Mn–Ga single crystals. Acta Materialia. 58(11). 3952–3962. 50 indexed citations
4.
Kohl, Manfred, et al.. (2009). Magnetic-Field-Induced Reorientation in Single Crystalline Ni-Mn-Ga Foil Actuators. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 1 indexed citations
5.
Schneider, Markus & R. Schneider. (2009). Measurement of the Current Distribution Between Multiple Brush Armatures During Launch. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 45(1). 436–441. 23 indexed citations
6.
Chmielus, Markus, et al.. (2008). Numerical Simulation of Twin-Twin Interaction in Magnetic Shape-Memory Alloys. MRS Proceedings. 1090. 1 indexed citations
7.
Rolfs, Katharina, et al.. (2008). Crystal quality boosts responsiveness of magnetic shape memory single crystals. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 321(8). 1063–1067. 18 indexed citations
8.
Chatterji, Tapan, Michael Marek Koza, F. Demmel, et al.. (2006). Coexistence of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic spin correlations inLa1.2Sr1.8Mn2O7. Physical Review B. 73(10). 8 indexed citations
9.
Stockert, O., M. Deppe, E. Faulhaber, et al.. (2005). Antiferromagnetism in : nature of the A phase. Physica B Condensed Matter. 359-361. 349–356. 8 indexed citations
10.
Schneider, Markus, et al.. (2005). Experiments with brush armatures: new technical solutions. 111–115. 2 indexed citations
11.
Stockert, O., M. Deppe, C. Geibel, et al.. (2003). NEUTRON DIFFERACTION STUDY OF THE MAGNETISM IN SINGLE-CRYSTALLINE CeCu2(Si1-xGex)2. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 34(2). 963–966. 8 indexed citations
12.
Svoboda, P., Jana Vejpravová, M. Hofmann, et al.. (2002). Antiferromagnetic Ordering in TmCu2. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics. 52(2). 267–270. 2 indexed citations
13.
Lappas, Alexandros, et al.. (2002). Spin-gap and antiferromagnetic correlations in low-dimensional PbNi 2-x A x V 2 O 8 compounds (A=Mg, Co). Applied Physics A. 74(0). s640–s642. 3 indexed citations
14.
Przeniosło, R., et al.. (2002). Modulated magnetic ordering in the Cu-doped pseudoperovskite system CaCuxMn3-xMn4O12. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 14(5). 1061–1065. 8 indexed citations
15.
Ehlers, G., C. Ritter, K. Knorr, et al.. (2000). Pressure-induced change of magnetic order in Tb1−xYxNiAl and TbNi1−xCuxAl. Physica B Condensed Matter. 276-278. 650–651. 4 indexed citations
16.
MacGregor, I. J. D., J. R. M. Annand, D. Branford, et al.. (1996). PiP — a large solid angle scintillation telescope for detecting protons and pions. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 382(3). 479–489. 7 indexed citations
17.
Knöpfle, K.T., H. Riedesel, P. Voruganti, et al.. (1986). E1 andE2/E0 form factors and strength distributions fromSi28(e,ep) andSi28(e,eα) coincidence scattering. Physical Review Letters. 56(26). 2789–2792. 30 indexed citations
18.
Wienhard, K., et al.. (1981). O16(γ,p)N15reaction with linearly polarized photons. Physical Review C. 24(3). 1363–1366. 8 indexed citations
19.
Ackermann, K., et al.. (1981). Ground state dipole transitions in 58Ni. Nuclear Physics A. 372(1-2). 1–12. 26 indexed citations
20.
Miska, H., H.-D. Gräf, A. Richter, et al.. (1975). High resolution inelastic electron scattering and radiation widths of levels in 16O. Physics Letters B. 58(2). 155–158. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026