Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Doubly fed induction generator usingback-to-back PWM convertersand its application to variable-speed wind-energy generation
19962.2k citationsR. Peña, John Clare et al.profile →
Overview of Control Systems for the Operation of DFIGs in Wind Energy Applications
2013559 citationsRoberto Cárdenas, R. Peña et al.profile →
Overview of control systems for the operation of DFIGs in wind energy applications
2013462 citationsR. Peña, Roberto Cárdenas et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Peña's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Peña with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Peña more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Peña. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Peña. The network helps show where R. Peña may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Peña
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Peña.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Peña based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Peña. R. Peña is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Soto, D., et al.. (2018). Control Strategy for an AC/DC Asymmetric Alternate Arm Converter. European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications.2 indexed citations
Rivera, Marco, Iván Contreras, José Rodríguez, R. Peña, & Patrick Wheeler. (2011). A simple current control method with instantaneous reactive power minimization for four-leg indirect matrix converters. European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications. 1–9.8 indexed citations
14.
Peña, R., et al.. (2011). Control of a Brushless Doubly-Fed induction generator via a matrix converter. European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications. 1–9.1 indexed citations
15.
Cárdenas, Roberto, et al.. (2011). Resonant controllers for the control of 4-leg Matrix Converters. European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications. 1–10.2 indexed citations
16.
Peña, R., et al.. (2009). Patrones alimentarios y niveles de actividad física en estudiantes de la Universidad Central de Venezuela. 15(3). 129–144.1 indexed citations
17.
Peña, R., et al.. (2009). Control strategy of an Indirect Matrix Converter with modifying DC voltage. European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications. 1–8.14 indexed citations
Peña, R. & G.M. Asher. (2002). Parameter sensitivity studies for induction motor parameter identification using extended Kalman filters. European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications. 306–311.11 indexed citations
20.
Sumner, Mark, G.M. Asher, & R. Peña. (2002). The experimental investigation of rotor time constant identification for vector controlled induction motor drives during transient operating conditions. European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications. 51–56.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.