R. Näätänen

983 total citations
10 papers, 773 citations indexed

About

R. Näätänen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, R. Näätänen has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 773 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in R. Näätänen's work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (8 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers). R. Näätänen is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Music Perception (8 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers). R. Näätänen collaborates with scholars based in Finland, Germany and Hungary. R. Näätänen's co-authors include István Winkler, Wolfgang Teder, Nelson Cowan, Teija Kujala, Erich Schröger, Petri Paavilainen, Mari Tervaniemi, Kimmo Alho, Marvin W. Sams and K. Reinikainen and has published in prestigious journals such as Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Psychopharmacology and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

R. Näätänen

10 papers receiving 734 citations

Peers

R. Näätänen

CN

ECP

SP

DEP

MUSIC

Risto Näätänen Finland

Elena Yago Spain

Wolfgang Teder Finland

Rika Takegata Finland

Benoı̂t Jutras Canada

Diana Deacon United States

Jacob Salminen Finland

T. McGee United States

Takeyuki Sutoh Japan

Tomiharu Hiruma Japan

Risto Näätänen Finland

R. Näätänen

764 ×1.1

CN

388 ×1.3

ECP

86 ×0.9

SP

42 ×0.6

DEP

31 ×0.6

MUSIC

Citations per year, relative to R. Näätänen R. Näätänen (= 1×) peers Risto Näätänen

Countries citing papers authored by R. Näätänen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Näätänen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Näätänen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Näätänen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Näätänen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Näätänen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Näätänen. The network helps show where R. Näätänen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Näätänen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Näätänen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Näätänen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Näätänen. R. Näätänen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Hirvonen, Ari, et al.. (2006). Psychosocial stress attenuates general sound processing and duration change detection. Psychophysiology. 44(1). 30–38. 37 indexed citations

2.

Kujala, Teija & R. Näätänen. (2001). The mismatch negativity in evaluating central auditory dysfunction in dyslexia. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 25(6). 535–543. 88 indexed citations

3.

Zuijen, Titia L. van, et al.. (2000). Lateralized automatic auditory processing of phonetic versus musical information: A PET study. Human Brain Mapping. 10(2). 74–79. 12 indexed citations

4.

Schröger, Erich, et al.. (1999). Electrophysiological indices of acute effects of ethanol on involuntary attention shifting. Psychopharmacology. 141(1). 16–21. 46 indexed citations

5.

Heinze, H.–J., et al.. (1999). Cognitive event-related potentials. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.. PubMed. 52. 91–5. 22 indexed citations

6.

Joutsiniemi, Sirkka-Liisa, Titta Ilvonen, Janne Sinkkonen, et al.. (1998). The mismatch negativity for duration decrement of auditory stimuli in healthy subjects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. 108(2). 154–159. 89 indexed citations

7.

Winkler, István, Mari Tervaniemi, Erich Schröger, Christian M. Wolff, & R. Näätänen. (1998). Preattentive processing of auditory spatial information in humans. Neuroscience Letters. 242(1). 49–52. 50 indexed citations

8.

Schröger, Erich, Petri Paavilainen, & R. Näätänen. (1994). Mismatch negativity to changes in a continuous tone with regularly varying frequencies. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. 92(2). 140–147. 40 indexed citations

9.

Cowan, Nelson, István Winkler, Wolfgang Teder, & R. Näätänen. (1993). Memory prerequisites of mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP).. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 19(4). 909–921. 286 indexed citations

10.

Alho, Kimmo, Marvin W. Sams, Petri Paavilainen, K. Reinikainen, & R. Näätänen. (1989). Event‐Related Brain Potentials Reflecting Processing of Relevant and Irrelevant Stimuli During Selective Listening. Psychophysiology. 26(5). 514–528. 103 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact