R. M. Crockett
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 12
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 7
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 7
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 4
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 2
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 2
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena 5
-
- CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors 1
- Co-authors
- Justyn R. MaundJ. J. EldridgeS. J. SmarttM. FraserS. MattilaA. Gal‐YamA. PastorelloI. J. Danziger
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (1 paper)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (8 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFinland
In The Last Decade
R. M. Crockett
14 papers receiving 949 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 975
- Instrumentation 165
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 295
- Radiation 7
- Biophysics 3
Countries citing papers authored by R. M. Crockett
This map shows the geographic impact of R. M. Crockett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. M. Crockett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. M. Crockett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. M. Crockett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. M. Crockett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. M. Crockett. The network helps show where R. M. Crockett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. M. Crockett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SN 2009md: Another faint supernova from a low mass progenitor | 2016 | 25 |
| 2 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 174 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 46 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 33 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 11 | The death of massive stars - I. Observational constraints on the progenitors of Type II-P supernovaebreakdown → | 2009 | 439 |
| 12 | 2008 | 63 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 49 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 41 |
About R. M. Crockett
R. M. Crockett is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 991 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (12 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (7 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (7 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (5 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (4 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (2 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (2 papers) and CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (975 citations), Instrumentation (165 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (295 citations). R. M. Crockett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Justyn R. Maund, J. J. Eldridge, S. J. Smartt, M. Fraser, S. Mattila, A. Gal‐Yam, A. Pastorello, I. J. Danziger, Stanislav S. Shabala and Kevin Schawinski. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.