M. Fraser

31.5k total citations
88 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

M. Fraser is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Instrumentation. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Fraser has authored 88 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 75 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 19 papers in Instrumentation. Recurrent topics in M. Fraser's work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (66 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (33 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (28 papers). M. Fraser is often cited by papers focused on Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (66 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (33 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (28 papers). M. Fraser collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. M. Fraser's co-authors include S. J. Smartt, Justyn R. Maund, J. J. Eldridge, R. M. Crockett, S. Valenti, J. Sollerman, R. Kotak, G. Gilmore, C. Inserra and Anders Jerkstrand and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

M. Fraser

72 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Fraser United Kingdom 24 1.7k 504 234 22 14 88 1.8k
P. Jakobsson Denmark 24 1.9k 1.1× 338 0.7× 225 1.0× 24 1.1× 2 0.1× 136 1.9k
Taotao Fang United States 18 917 0.5× 422 0.8× 117 0.5× 40 1.8× 4 0.3× 62 970
J. Michael Burgess Germany 18 762 0.4× 311 0.6× 46 0.2× 9 0.4× 24 1.7× 46 832
E. Caffau France 10 911 0.5× 112 0.2× 256 1.1× 40 1.8× 8 0.6× 13 959
J. Irwin Canada 22 1.2k 0.7× 460 0.9× 142 0.6× 21 1.0× 2 0.1× 70 1.2k
Ryan Ferguson United States 4 499 0.3× 321 0.6× 64 0.3× 42 1.9× 3 0.2× 9 705
M. Modjaz United States 24 2.0k 1.1× 662 1.3× 183 0.8× 12 0.5× 72 2.0k
P. Temi United States 20 1.1k 0.7× 208 0.4× 221 0.9× 87 4.0× 20 1.4× 49 1.2k
Brandon S. Hensley United States 15 730 0.4× 161 0.3× 55 0.2× 48 2.2× 4 0.3× 50 790
L. Spina Australia 21 986 0.6× 111 0.2× 350 1.5× 24 1.1× 2 0.1× 48 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by M. Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Fraser. The network helps show where M. Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Fraser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Fraser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Fraser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Fraser. M. Fraser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moran, S., R. Kotak, M. Fraser, et al.. (2024). Red eminence: The intermediate-luminosity red transient AT 2022fnm. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 688. A161–A161.
2.
Chrimes, A A, A. J. Levan, J. J. Eldridge, et al.. (2023). Searching for ejected supernova companions in the era of precise proper motion and radial velocity measurements. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 522(2). 2029–2046. 4 indexed citations
3.
Stritzinger, M., F. Taddia, Stephen S. Lawrence, et al.. (2022). Hubble Space Telescope Reveals Spectacular Light Echoes Associated with the Stripped-envelope Supernova 2016adj in the Iconic Dust Lane of Centaurus A. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 939(1). L8–L8. 1 indexed citations
4.
Reguitti, A., A. Pastorello, G. Pignata, et al.. (2022). SN 2021foa, a transitional event between a Type IIn (SN 2009ip-like) and a Type Ibn supernova. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 662. L10–L10. 6 indexed citations
5.
O’Neill, D., R. Kotak, M. Fraser, et al.. (2019). A progenitor candidate for the type II-P supernova SN 2018aoq in NGC 4151. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 22 indexed citations
6.
Brennan, S., et al.. (2019). LIGO/Virgo S191213g: WHT spectroscopy of candidate counterparts. GCN. 26429. 1.
7.
Wiersema, K., A. J. Levan, M. Fraser, et al.. (2019). LIGO/Virgo S190425z: ZTF19aarzaod WHT spectroscopy.. GRB Coordinates Network. 24209. 1.
8.
Torres, M. A. P., J. Moldón, S. Mattila, et al.. (2019). Unambiguous radio detection of the tidal disruption event AT2019dsg with e-MERLIN. The astronomer's telegram. 12960. 1.
9.
Krühler, T., M. Fraser, G. Leloudas, et al.. (2018). The supermassive black hole coincident with the luminous transient ASASSN-15lh. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 610. A14–A14. 22 indexed citations
10.
Kalari, V. M., J. S. Vink, P. L. Dufton, & M. Fraser. (2018). How common is LBV S Doradus variability at low metallicity?. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 19 indexed citations
11.
Karamehmetoglu, E., F. Taddia, J. Sollerman, et al.. (2017). OGLE-2014-SN-131: A long-rising Type Ibn supernova from a massive progenitor. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 602. A93–A93. 12 indexed citations
12.
Jonker, P. G., M. Fraser, S. Nissanke, et al.. (2017). LIGO/Virgo G299232: WHT spectrum of MASTER OT J033744.97+723159.0. GRB Coordinates Network. 21737. 1. 1 indexed citations
13.
Lyman, J., D. Homan, K. Maguire, et al.. (2017). LIGO/VIRGO G298048: ePESSTO optical spectra of the candidate optical/NIR counterpart of the gravitational wave G298048 in NGC4993.. GRB Coordinates Network. 21582. 1. 1 indexed citations
14.
Morales-Garoffolo, A., N. Elias–Rosa, Melina C. Bersten, et al.. (2015). SN 2011fu: a type IIb supernova with a luminous double-peaked light curve. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 454(1). 95–114. 20 indexed citations
15.
Jerkstrand, Anders, S. J. Smartt, J. Sollerman, et al.. (2015). Supersolar Ni/Fe production in the Type IIP SN 2012ec. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 448(3). 2482–2494. 34 indexed citations
16.
Monard, L. A. G., M. Fraser, M. Smith, et al.. (2015). Supernova 2015F in NGC 2442 = Psn J07361576-6930230. 4081. 1. 1 indexed citations
17.
Inserra, C., R. Scalzo, M. Fraser, et al.. (2013). SN2012ca: a stripped envelope core-collapse SN interacting with dense circumstellar medium. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters. 437(1). L51–L55. 13 indexed citations
18.
Fraser, M., R. Kotak, A. Pastorello, et al.. (2013). First observations of the reappearance of SN 2009ip with PESSTO. ATel. 4953. 1. 1 indexed citations
19.
Smartt, S. J., S. Valenti, M. Fraser, et al.. (2013). PESSTO: The Public ESO Spectroscopic Survey of Transient Objects. Max Planck Digital Library. 154. 50–52. 4 indexed citations
20.
Fraser, M., et al.. (2009). Gemini-NIRI K-band observations of the sites of two recent radio transients in M82.. The astronomer's telegram. 2131. 1. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026