R. John Lye

14 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

R. John Lye
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Reproductive Medicine 112
  • Genetics 90
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 52
  • Molecular Biology 197
  • Surgery 121
Replace David Kagan with:
David Kagan United States
John R. Pepperell United States
Katarzyna Ożegowska Poland
Laura Lecce Australia
Carlotta Boscaro Italy
Cynthia R. Hill United States
Susana Belli Argentina
Qingfeng Yu China
Agnieszka Gach Poland
R. John Lye relative to David Kagan United States David Kagan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
David Kagan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. John Lye

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. John Lye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. John Lye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. John Lye more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. John Lye

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. John Lye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. John Lye. The network helps show where R. John Lye may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. John Lye, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. John Lye Line = papers co-authored together R. John Lye links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1
Testicular regulation of epididymal gene expression.
1998106
2 201186
3 201040
4 201340
5 201533
6 199923
7 201117
8 201514
9 200411
10 200310
11 20246
12 20035
13 20243
14
Transgenic technologies for the study of epididymal function.
20001
15 20250
16 20240

About R. John Lye

R. John Lye is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Archeology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (4 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (4 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (4 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (4 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (3 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Paleopathology and ancient diseases (3 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (112 citations), Genetics (90 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (52 citations), Molecular Biology (197 citations) and Surgery (121 citations). R. John Lye has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Barry T. Hinton, Jacquelyn C. Labus, Zi‐Jian Lan, Daniel B. Rudolph, Brian H. Annex, John M. Sanders, W. Schuyler Jones, Bingfang Xu, Ling Yang and Jason D. Allen. Their work appears in journals such as Biology of Reproduction, International Journal of Legal Medicine, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, Scientific Reports and Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact