R. Jack Weber

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

R. Jack Weber is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, R. Jack Weber has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 1 paper in Social Psychology and 1 paper in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in R. Jack Weber's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Educational Research and Analysis (1 paper) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper). R. Jack Weber is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Educational Research and Analysis (1 paper) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper). R. Jack Weber collaborates with scholars based in United States. R. Jack Weber's co-authors include Jennifer Crocker, Tom R. Tyler, Reid Hastie, Sukhwinder S. Shergill, Krystyna A. Mathiak, Mikhail Zvyagintsev and Martin Klasen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, NeuroImage and Law & Society Review.

In The Last Decade

R. Jack Weber

5 papers receiving 905 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs.

1983 603 citations R. Jack Weber, Jennifer Crocker Journal of Personality and Social Psychology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
R. Jack Weber United States	5	722	364	164	132	126	6	1.0k
Paget H. Gross United States	6	530 0.7×	356 1.0×	107 0.7×	163 1.2×	74 0.6×	7	974
Meryl Lichtenstein United States	6	626 0.9×	387 1.1×	120 0.7×	304 2.3×	143 1.1×	6	1.1k
Christine Hepburn United States	8	542 0.8×	298 0.8×	239 1.5×	140 1.1×	49 0.4×	10	865
Richard L. Zweigenhaft United States	21	549 0.8×	224 0.6×	106 0.6×	102 0.8×	68 0.5×	52	1.1k
Anne Locksley United States	9	642 0.9×	364 1.0×	370 2.3×	145 1.1×	54 0.4×	15	1.1k
Paul R. Nail United States	16	708 1.0×	493 1.4×	61 0.4×	156 1.2×	86 0.7×	34	1.2k
Jill M. Leibold United States	7	661 0.9×	444 1.2×	129 0.8×	155 1.2×	66 0.5×	8	905
Grażyna Wieczorkowska Poland	7	820 1.1×	674 1.9×	84 0.5×	182 1.4×	80 0.6×	14	1.2k
Amy C. Lewis United States	7	854 1.2×	659 1.8×	115 0.7×	209 1.6×	99 0.8×	15	1.2k
Judith B. White United States	10	568 0.8×	572 1.6×	133 0.8×	154 1.2×	57 0.5×	11	1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by R. Jack Weber

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Jack Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Jack Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Jack Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Jack Weber

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Jack Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Jack Weber. The network helps show where R. Jack Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Jack Weber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Jack Weber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Jack Weber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Jack Weber. R. Jack Weber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Mathiak, Krystyna A., R. Jack Weber, Martin Klasen, Mikhail Zvyagintsev, & Sukhwinder S. Shergill. (2009). Temporal pole involvement in subjective evaluation of the game failure. NeuroImage. 47. S138–S138.

2.

Hastie, Reid, et al.. (1990). Creating complex social conjunction categories from simple categories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 28(3). 242–247. 58 indexed citations

3.

Crocker, Jennifer & R. Jack Weber. (1983). Cognitive Structure and Stereotype Change. ACR North American Advances. 11 indexed citations

4.

Weber, R. Jack & Jennifer Crocker. (1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 45(5). 961–977. 603 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Crocker, Jennifer, et al.. (1983). Person memory and causal attributions.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 44(1). 55–66. 132 indexed citations

6.

Tyler, Tom R. & R. Jack Weber. (1982). Support for the Death Penalty; Instrumental Response to Crime, or Symbolic Attitude?. Law & Society Review. 17(1). 21–45. 213 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact