R. Jack Weber
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cultural Differences and Values
Papers in
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 2
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 1
-
- Deception detection and forensic psychology 1
- Co-authors
- Jennifer Crocker (3 shared papers)Tom R. Tyler (1 shared paper)Reid Hastie (1 shared paper)Krystyna A. Mathiak (1 shared paper)Martin Klasen (1 shared paper)Mikhail Zvyagintsev (1 shared paper)Sukhwinder S. Shergill (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2 papers)Law & Society Review (1 paper)NeuroImage (1 paper)Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society (1 paper)ACR North American Advances (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
R. Jack Weber
5 papers receiving 905 citations
R. Jack Weber's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- General Decision Sciences 39
- Social Psychology 364
- Gender Studies 164
- Applied Psychology 87
- Sociology and Political Science 722
Countries citing papers authored by R. Jack Weber
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Jack Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Jack Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Jack Weber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Jack Weber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Jack Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Jack Weber. The network helps show where R. Jack Weber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside R. Jack Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Hit paper breakdown → | 1983 | 603 |
| 2 | 1982 | 213 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 132 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 58 | |
| 5 | Cognitive Structure and Stereotype Change | 1983 | 11 |
| 6 | 2009 | 0 |
About R. Jack Weber
R. Jack Weber is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Literature and Literary Theory and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (1 paper), Memory Processes and Influences (1 paper), Deception detection and forensic psychology (1 paper), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (1 paper), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (1 paper), Media Influence and Health (1 paper) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (39 citations), Social Psychology (364 citations), Gender Studies (164 citations), Applied Psychology (87 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (722 citations). R. Jack Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Crocker, Tom R. Tyler, Reid Hastie, Krystyna A. Mathiak, Martin Klasen, Mikhail Zvyagintsev and Sukhwinder S. Shergill. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Law & Society Review, NeuroImage, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society and ACR North American Advances.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.