R. J. Etches
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 0.2%
- Reproductive Medicine top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Co-authors
- F.E. RobinsonAnn M. Verrinder GibbinsStephen C. HarveyJames N. PetitteF. J. CunninghamMarie‐Cecile van de LavoirMary E. ClarkPhilip A. Leighton
- Topics
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology (56 papers)Animal Genetics and Reproduction (40 papers)CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (28 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
R. J. Etches
125 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Genetics 2.0k
- Molecular Biology 1.8k
- Animal Science and Zoology 1.5k
- Reproductive Medicine 651
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 576
Countries citing papers authored by R. J. Etches
This map shows the geographic impact of R. J. Etches's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. J. Etches with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. J. Etches more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. J. Etches
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. J. Etches. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. J. Etches. The network helps show where R. J. Etches may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. J. Etches
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. J. Etches. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. J. Etches based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. J. Etches. R. J. Etches is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 58 | |
| 3 | 57 | |
| 4 | 86 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Transgenic chickens: past, present, and future. | 18 |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 68 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 73 | |
| 20 | A comparison of several extenders and methods for freezing avian semen. | 2 |
About R. J. Etches
R. J. Etches is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Reproductive Medicine and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 129 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (56 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (40 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (28 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (1.5k citations), Reproductive Medicine (651 citations) and Genetics (2.0k citations). R. J. Etches has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include F.E. Robinson, Ann M. Verrinder Gibbins, Stephen C. Harvey, James N. Petitte, F. J. Cunningham, Marie‐Cecile van de Lavoir, Mary E. Clark, Philip A. Leighton, K. W. Cheng and M. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.