R. J. Chambers
- Insect Science top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- K. D. SunderlandI. J. WyattA. F. G. DixonNeil HelyerStephen P. LongD. L. StaceyChristopher D. McQuaidRachel Neems
- Topics
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (20 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers)Plant Parasitism and Resistance (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth AfricaUnited States
In The Last Decade
R. J. Chambers
27 papers receiving 690 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Insect Science 622
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 320
- Plant Science 311
- Ecology 135
- Molecular Biology 75
Countries citing papers authored by R. J. Chambers
This map shows the geographic impact of R. J. Chambers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. J. Chambers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. J. Chambers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. J. Chambers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. J. Chambers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. J. Chambers. The network helps show where R. J. Chambers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. J. Chambers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. J. Chambers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. J. Chambers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. J. Chambers. R. J. Chambers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 57 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 96 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 99 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 77 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 73 | |
| 18 | The abundance and effectiveness of natural enemies of cereal aphids on two farms in southern England. | 6 |
| 19 | A survey of cereal aphids and their natural enemies in winter wheat in 1980. | 33 |
| 20 | 56 |
About R. J. Chambers
R. J. Chambers is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 794 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (20 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (622 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (320 citations) and Plant Science (311 citations). R. J. Chambers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include K. D. Sunderland, I. J. Wyatt, A. F. G. Dixon, Neil Helyer, Stephen P. Long, D. L. Stacey, Christopher D. McQuaid, Rachel Neems, A. J. McLachlan and G. P. Vickerman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Ecology, Journal of Applied Ecology and Animal Behaviour.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.