R. Grover
- Geophysics top 5%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Mechanics of Materials top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- P. A. UrtiewWilliam G. HooverDavid A. YoungG. C. KennedyI. C. GettingMarvin RossW. T. AshurstJagannadham Akella
- Topics
- High-pressure geophysics and materials (17 papers)Energetic Materials and Combustion (5 papers)Geological and Geochemical Analysis (4 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Chemical PhysicsJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresJournal of Applied Physics
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
R. Grover
22 papers receiving 776 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Geophysics 550
- Materials Chemistry 487
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 157
- Mechanics of Materials 143
- Biomedical Engineering 140
Countries citing papers authored by R. Grover
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Grover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Grover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Grover more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Grover
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Grover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Grover. The network helps show where R. Grover may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Grover
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Grover. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Grover based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Grover. R. Grover is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70 | |
| 2 | 37 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | Theory of the carbon phase diagram at high pressures and temperatures | 1 |
| 5 | Three phase carbon EOS model with electronic excitation | 1 |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 59 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 132 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 132 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 62 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 47 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About R. Grover
R. Grover is a scholar working on Geophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 874 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include High-pressure geophysics and materials (17 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (5 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (550 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (125 citations) and Materials Chemistry (487 citations). R. Grover has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include P. A. Urtiew, William G. Hoover, David A. Young, G. C. Kennedy, I. C. Getting, Marvin Ross, W. T. Ashurst, Jagannadham Akella, Bill Moran and R. N. Keeler. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.