R. F. Mottram
-
- Cardiovascular and exercise physiology 5
- Physiology top 10%
-
- Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments 2
-
- Sports Performance and Training 3
-
- Muscle activation and electromyography studies 2
-
- Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus 1
-
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 1
-
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management 1
-
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 1
R. F. Mottram
15 papers receiving 427 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Complementary and alternative medicine 127
- Physiology 216
- Cell Biology 100
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 136
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 29
Countries citing papers authored by R. F. Mottram
This map shows the geographic impact of R. F. Mottram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. F. Mottram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. F. Mottram more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. F. Mottram
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. F. Mottram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. F. Mottram. The network helps show where R. F. Mottram may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 16 scholars most cited alongside R. F. Mottram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1973 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1973 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1973 | 19 | |
| 4 | 1972 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1971 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1970 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1965 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1964 | 18 | |
| 9 | 1964 | 31 | |
| 10 | 1962 | 31 | |
| 11 | 1958 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1958 | 72 | |
| 13 | Cardiac output in the cat; a comparison between the Fick method and a radioactive indicator dilution method. | 1957 | 3 |
| 14 | 1956 | 9 | |
| 15 | 1955 | 70 | |
| 16 | 1955 | 249 | |
| 17 | The relationship between blood flow, arterio-venous oxygen difference, and oxygen uptake of human skeletal muscle. | 1955 | 3 |
About R. F. Mottram
R. F. Mottram is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (5 papers), Sports Performance and Training (3 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (2 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (2 papers), Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus (1 paper), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (1 paper), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (1 paper) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (127 citations), Physiology (216 citations) and Cell Biology (100 citations). R. F. Mottram has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Keith Cooper, O. G. Edholm, D. R. Coles, T. D. R. Hockaday, George Pickering, Patricia Baker, W. I. Cranston, Peter R. Lynch, Oliver E. Owen and Geraint Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, The Lancet, Investigative Radiology, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Clinical Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.