Citations per year, relative to R. Engel R. Engel (= 1×)
peers
L.G. Tkatchev
Countries citing papers authored by R. Engel
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Engel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Engel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Engel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Engel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Engel. The network helps show where R. Engel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Engel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Engel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Engel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Engel. R. Engel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Roth, M., et al.. (2013). On the importance of the energy resolution for identifying sources of UHECR. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 33. 679.
4.
Homola, P., et al.. (2013). Angular Distribution of Cherenkov Photons from Air Showers Initiated by Protons, Iron Nuclei Or Photons of Energies from 10 TeV to 10 EeV in the Presence of the Geomagnetic Field. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 33. 591.1 indexed citations
Pierog, T., et al.. (2008). Latest Results of Air Shower Simulation Programs CORSIKA and CONEX. ICRC. 4. 625–628.2 indexed citations
7.
Huege, T., R. Ulrich, & R. Engel. (2008). Energy and composition sensitivity of geosynchrotron radio emission from cosmic ray air showers. arXiv (Cornell University).3 indexed citations
8.
Калмыков, Н. Н., A. A. Konstantinov, & R. Engel. (2007). Calculation of radio emission from high-energy air showers. ICRC. 4. 633–636.1 indexed citations
9.
Blümer, J., R. Engel, D. Góra, et al.. (2005). Atmospheric Profiles at the Southern Pierre Auger Observatory and their Relevance to Air Shower Measurement. ICRC. 7. 123.3 indexed citations
10.
Nerling, F., et al.. (2005). Description of Cherenkov light production in high-energy air showers. arXiv (Cornell University).
11.
Pierog, T., Thaisa Storchi‐Bergmann, R. Engel, et al.. (2005). Dependence of the longitudinal shower profile on the characteristics of hadronic multiparticle production. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 7. 103.
12.
Nerling, F., et al.. (2005). Impact of a new Cerenkov light parameterisation on the reconstruction of shower profiles from Auger hybrid data. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 7. 131.
13.
Keilhauer, B., R. Engel, H.O. Klages, & T. Waldenmaier. (2005). Nitrogen fluorescence yield in dependence on atmospheric conditions. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 7. 119.1 indexed citations
14.
Engel, R. & H. Rebel. (2004). Theory of Hadronic Interactions and Its Application to Modeling of Cosmic Ray Hadronic Showers. Acta Physica Polonica B. 35(1). 321.3 indexed citations
15.
Engel, R., et al.. (2001). The flux of atmospheric muons. ICRC. 3. 1029.
16.
Mücke, A., J. P. Rachen, R. Engel, R. J. Protheroe, & Todor Stanev. (2000). Photomeson production in astrophysical sources. CERN Bulletin. 80.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.