Acta Physica Polonica B

2.7k papers and 14.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Acta Physica Polonica B in the last decades have received a total of 14.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Physica Polonica B usually cover Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.4k papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (478 papers) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (398 papers) specifically the topics of Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (679 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (546 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (460 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Physica Polonica B are К. А. Бронников, Laurence F. Abbott, F. Jegerlehner, J. A. Aguilar–Saavedra, Karl Landsteiner, Wojciech Florkowski, Michael Strickland, Bernardo Spagnolo, John C. Collins and A. Sobiczewski.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Physica Polonica B

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Physica Polonica B. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Physica Polonica B.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Physica Polonica B

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Physica Polonica B. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Physica Polonica B with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Physica Polonica B more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025