R E Park

611 total citations
8 papers, 511 citations indexed

About

R E Park is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, R E Park has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 511 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 4 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in R E Park's work include Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). R E Park is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). R E Park collaborates with scholars based in United States and Russia. R E Park's co-authors include Robert H. Brook, David H. Solomon, Jacqueline Kosecoff, Arlène Fink, M R Chassin, Nancy J. Merrick, Katherine L. Kahn, Joan Keesey, M. R. Chassin and Albert L. Siu and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Annals of Internal Medicine and American Journal of Public Health.

In The Last Decade

R E Park

8 papers receiving 471 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
R E Park United States	7	186	180	116	99	87	8	511
Constance M. Winslow United States	6	204 1.1×	191 1.1×	207 1.8×	219 2.2×	92 1.1×	7	595
Jay A Gold United States	11	252 1.4×	246 1.4×	359 3.1×	62 0.6×	107 1.2×	38	801
Rory McQuillan Canada	14	126 0.7×	192 1.1×	46 0.4×	83 0.8×	119 1.4×	30	732
Mike J.L. Peters Netherlands	15	107 0.6×	201 1.1×	110 0.9×	54 0.5×	79 0.9×	50	714
Jeanne D. Scinto United States	14	86 0.5×	132 0.7×	99 0.9×	77 0.8×	78 0.9×	17	782
Naomi J. Banks United States	5	93 0.5×	101 0.6×	89 0.8×	52 0.5×	33 0.4×	7	394
Cathy Lodewijckx Belgium	14	122 0.7×	195 1.1×	83 0.7×	114 1.2×	272 3.1×	25	625
Eileen P. Shields United States	7	199 1.1×	160 0.9×	359 3.1×	199 2.0×	70 0.8×	7	725
W. A. Ghali Canada	9	96 0.5×	63 0.3×	79 0.7×	113 1.1×	46 0.5×	10	377
Richard P. Kusserow United States	4	143 0.8×	154 0.9×	51 0.4×	37 0.4×	51 0.6×	10	486

Countries citing papers authored by R E Park

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R E Park's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R E Park with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R E Park more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R E Park

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R E Park. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R E Park. The network helps show where R E Park may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R E Park

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R E Park. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R E Park based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R E Park. R E Park is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Park, R E, et al.. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Tracking of Otologic Instruments in Mastoidectomy Videos. Otology & Neurotology. 45(10). 1192–1197. 2 indexed citations

2.

Shapiro, Martin F., R E Park, Joan Keesey, & Robert H. Brook. (1993). Mortality differences between New York City municipal and voluntary hospitals, for selected conditions.. American Journal of Public Health. 83(7). 1024–1026. 9 indexed citations

3.

Kahn, Katherine L., R E Park, Jack A. Vennes, & Robert H. Brook. (1992). Assigning Appropriateness Ratings for Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Using Two Different Approaches. Medical Care. 30(11). 1016–1028. 30 indexed citations

4.

Brook, Robert H., R E Park, M. R. Chassin, et al.. (1990). Carotid Endarterectomy for Elderly Patients: Predicting Complications. Annals of Internal Medicine. 113(10). 747–753. 68 indexed citations

5.

Park, R E. (1990). Explaining variations in hospital death rates. Randomness, severity of illness, quality of care. JAMA. 264(4). 484–490. 189 indexed citations

6.

Park, R E, Arlène Fink, Robert H. Brook, et al.. (1989). Physician ratings of appropriate indications for three procedures: theoretical indications vs indications used in practice.. American Journal of Public Health. 79(4). 445–447. 71 indexed citations

7.

Fink, Arlène, Albert L. Siu, Robert H. Brook, R E Park, & David H. Solomon. (1987). Assuring the quality of health care for older persons. An expert panel's priorities.. PubMed. 258(14). 1905–8. 43 indexed citations

8.

Merrick, Nancy J., Arlène Fink, R E Park, et al.. (1987). Derivation of clinical indications for carotid endarterectomy by an expert panel.. American Journal of Public Health. 77(2). 187–190. 99 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact