R. Chiba
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Materials Chemistry
- Organic Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Hiroshi YamamotoToshikazu NakamuraToshihiro TakahashiK. HirakiK. NakaiHiroshi YokotaH. En’yoM. Sekimoto
- Topics
- Nuclear physics research studies (14 papers)Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (9 papers)High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Nuclear and High Energy PhysicsElectronic, Optical and Magnetic MaterialsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Partner nations
- JapanGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
R. Chiba
34 papers receiving 420 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 155
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 143
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 126
- Materials Chemistry 64
- Organic Chemistry 61
Countries citing papers authored by R. Chiba
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Chiba's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Chiba with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Chiba more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Chiba
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Chiba. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Chiba. The network helps show where R. Chiba may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Chiba
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Chiba. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Chiba based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Chiba. R. Chiba is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 44 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About R. Chiba
R. Chiba is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 35 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear physics research studies (14 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (9 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (143 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (155 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (126 citations). R. Chiba has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hiroshi Yamamoto, Toshikazu Nakamura, Toshihiro Takahashi, K. Hiraki, K. Nakai, Hiroshi Yokota, H. En’yo, M. Sekimoto, K. Nakayama and Masatoshi Ukai. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Physical Review B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.