R. Blake
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 20
- Neural dynamics and brain function 11
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 3
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 4
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Neurology top 10%
-
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 6
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 2
-
- Advanced Vision and Imaging 2
-
- Color perception and design 2
- Co-authors
- Ian P. HowardHugh R. WilsonRobert P. O’SheaDavid AlaisYue‐De YangDavid HalpernDavid L. GildenChang Hwan Kim
- Journals
- Journal of Vision (9 papers)Journal of the Optical Society of America A (2 papers)Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaCanada
In The Last Decade
R. Blake
24 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 259
- Ophthalmology 146
- Human-Computer Interaction 86
- Neurology 119
Countries citing papers authored by R. Blake
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Blake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Blake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Blake more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Blake
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Blake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Blake. The network helps show where R. Blake may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 24 scholars most cited alongside R. Blake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 25 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 53 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 215 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 88 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 44 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 26 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 49 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 175 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 67 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 57 | |
| 16 | 1987 | 8 | |
| 17 | Human Visual Orientationbreakdown → | 1982 | 778 |
| 18 | 1981 | 5 | |
| 19 | Binocular summation during suppression (A) | 1980 | 2 |
| 20 | 1961 | 1 |
About R. Blake
R. Blake is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction, Ophthalmology, Sensory Systems and Social Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (20 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (2 papers) and Color perception and design (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (259 citations), Ophthalmology (146 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (86 citations) and Neurology (119 citations). R. Blake has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ian P. Howard, Hugh R. Wilson, Robert P. O’Shea, David Alais, Yue‐De Yang, David Halpern, David L. Gilden, Chang Hwan Kim, Thomas J. Palmeri and Sang Chul Chong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Vision Research and Cortex.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.