Qin Mao
About
In The Last Decade
Qin Mao
5 papers receiving 293 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Infectious Diseases 211
- Neurology 70
- Molecular Biology 49
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 35
- Epidemiology 34
Countries citing papers authored by Qin Mao
This map shows the geographic impact of Qin Mao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Qin Mao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qin Mao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Qin Mao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Qin Mao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Qin Mao. The network helps show where Qin Mao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Qin Mao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Qin Mao. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Qin Mao based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Qin Mao. Qin Mao is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Efficacy and safety of three new oral antiviral treatment (molnupiravir, fluvoxamine and Paxlovid) for COVID-19：a meta-analysis breakdown → | 272 |
| 6 | 22 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.