Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Chemical components and pharmacological benefits of Basil (Ocimum basilicum): a review
2020208 citationsMohamad Hesam Shahrajabian, Wenli Sun et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Qi Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Qi Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qi Cheng more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Qi Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Qi Cheng. The network helps show where Qi Cheng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Qi Cheng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Qi Cheng.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Qi Cheng based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Qi Cheng. Qi Cheng is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Shahrajabian, Mohamad Hesam, Wenli Sun, & Qi Cheng. (2020). A SHORT REVIEW OF GOJI BERRY, GINGER, GINSENG AND ASTRAGALUS IN TRADITIONAL CHINESE AND ASIAN MEDICINE. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 3(2). 36–45.6 indexed citations
7.
Sun, Wenli, et al.. (2020). Adaptation of Acupuncture and Traditional Chinese Herbal Medicines Models Because of Climate Change. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 16(1). 85–90.11 indexed citations
Shahrajabian, Mohamad Hesam, et al.. (2019). Jujube, a super-fruit in traditional Chinese medicine, heading for modern pharmacological science. Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies. 7(4). 173–178.31 indexed citations
Cheng, Qi. (2010). Recombinase-Aid Amplification:a Novel Technology of in vitro Rapid Nucleic Acid Amplification.23 indexed citations
15.
Cheng, Qi. (2010). Seismic interpretation of occurrence of Permian magmatite and its emplacement in Tabei uplift,Tarim basin. Acta Petrologica Sinica.1 indexed citations
16.
Cheng, Qi. (2010). Study on Oxidative Desulfurization of Simulated Oil With The Acetic Acid-based Ionic Liquid Phase Transfer Catalyst.1 indexed citations
17.
Cheng, Qi. (2009). Radar Absorbing Properties of Light Radar Absorbing Materials Based on Hollow-porous Carbon Fibers. Journal of Inorganic Materials.7 indexed citations
18.
Cheng, Qi. (2008). Microwave Absorbing Properties of Short Hollow Carbon Fiber Composites. Journal of Inorganic Materials.4 indexed citations
19.
Cheng, Qi. (2004). A New Approach to Renovation of Technology Alliance as Strategic Choice. Journal of Northeastern University.
20.
Cheng, Qi. (2002). Filching detection in electric energy measuring and billing system. Dianli zidonghua shebei.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.