Preston Williams

538 total citations
17 papers, 400 citations indexed

About

Preston Williams is a scholar working on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Preston Williams has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 400 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Neurology, 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Preston Williams's work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (7 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (5 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (4 papers). Preston Williams is often cited by papers focused on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (7 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (5 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (4 papers). Preston Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Preston Williams's co-authors include John H. Martin, Bryan Kolb, Omar A. Gharbawie, Ian Q. Whishaw, Claudia L. R. Gonzalez, Jeffrey A. Kleim, J. A. Kleim, Robbin Gibb, Richelle Mychasiuk and Yu‐Qiu Jiang and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Neuroscience and European Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Preston Williams

17 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Preston Williams United States 12 150 132 99 91 88 17 400
Max M. Klein United States 8 118 0.8× 69 0.5× 356 3.6× 119 1.3× 81 0.9× 13 728
Gregg Meekins United States 15 194 1.3× 109 0.8× 85 0.9× 29 0.3× 88 1.0× 21 582
P. Li Voti Italy 12 395 2.6× 138 1.0× 108 1.1× 60 0.7× 248 2.8× 21 625
Iran Salimi United States 11 99 0.7× 60 0.5× 117 1.2× 72 0.8× 319 3.6× 13 518
Antony G. Hacking United States 5 113 0.8× 75 0.6× 67 0.7× 42 0.5× 126 1.4× 6 331
Claus Reinsberger Germany 6 267 1.8× 62 0.5× 53 0.5× 33 0.4× 172 2.0× 16 396
Gionata Strigaro Italy 15 302 2.0× 120 0.9× 162 1.6× 26 0.3× 318 3.6× 40 634
M. Bakker Netherlands 9 89 0.6× 96 0.7× 96 1.0× 18 0.2× 252 2.9× 16 686
Giulia Bommarito Italy 14 71 0.5× 69 0.5× 74 0.7× 29 0.3× 151 1.7× 33 568
F. Balestrieri Italy 10 334 2.2× 53 0.4× 56 0.6× 33 0.4× 205 2.3× 15 464

Countries citing papers authored by Preston Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Preston Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Preston Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Preston Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Preston Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Preston Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Preston Williams. The network helps show where Preston Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Preston Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Preston Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Preston Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Preston Williams. Preston Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Vöröslakos, Mihály, et al.. (2025). Repeated tDCS at Clinically Relevant Field Intensity Can Boost Concurrent Motor Learning in Rats. Journal of Neuroscience. 45(20). e1495242025–e1495242025. 3 indexed citations
2.
Williams, Preston, Eva Schelbaum, Heather Alexander, et al.. (2024). Combined biomaterial scaffold and neuromodulation strategy to promote tissue repair and corticospinal connectivity after spinal cord injury in a rodent model. Experimental Neurology. 382. 114965–114965. 1 indexed citations
3.
Williams, Preston, Dennis Q. Truong, Alan C. Seifert, et al.. (2022). Selective augmentation of corticospinal motor drive with trans-spinal direct current stimulation in the cat. Brain stimulation. 15(3). 624–634. 12 indexed citations
4.
Kolb, Bryan, Bryan Kolb, & Preston Williams. (2020). A Review of Pre-Clinical Studies for the Treatment of Neonatal Brain Injury. 1–11. 1 indexed citations
5.
Khadka, Niranjan, Dennis Q. Truong, Preston Williams, John H. Martin, & Marom Bikson. (2019). The Quasi-uniform assumption for Spinal Cord Stimulation translational research. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 328. 108446–108446. 16 indexed citations
6.
Williams, Preston, Yu‐Qiu Jiang, & John H. Martin. (2017). Motor system plasticity after unilateral injury in the developing brain. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 59(12). 1224–1229. 28 indexed citations
7.
Williams, Preston & John H. Martin. (2015). Motor Cortex Activity Organizes the Developing Rubrospinal System. Journal of Neuroscience. 35(39). 13363–13374. 12 indexed citations
8.
Friel, Kathleen M., Preston Williams, Najet Serradj, Samit Chakrabarty, & John H. Martin. (2014). Activity-Based Therapies for Repair of the Corticospinal System Injured during Development. Frontiers in Neurology. 5. 229–229. 55 indexed citations
9.
Williams, Preston, Sang Soo Kim, & John H. Martin. (2014). Postnatal Maturation of the Red Nucleus Motor Map Depends on Rubrospinal Connections with Forelimb Motor Pools. Journal of Neuroscience. 34(12). 4432–4441. 25 indexed citations
10.
Jiang, Yu‐Qiu, Preston Williams, & John H. Martin. (2013). Rapid and persistent impairments of the forelimb motor representations following cervical deafferentation in rats. European Journal of Neuroscience. 38(12). 3702–3711. 9 indexed citations
11.
Williams, Preston, et al.. (2012). Comparison of external beam treatment techniques for T1-2, N0, M0 glottic cancers. Medical dosimetry. 37(2). 221–224. 5 indexed citations
12.
Kolb, Bryan, Richelle Mychasiuk, Preston Williams, & Robbin Gibb. (2011). Brain plasticity and recovery from early cortical injury. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 53(s4). 4–8. 50 indexed citations
13.
Gharbawie, Omar A., Preston Williams, Bryan Kolb, & Ian Q. Whishaw. (2008). Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion disrupts the forelimb movement representations of rat motor cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience. 28(5). 951–963. 13 indexed citations
14.
Williams, Preston, Omar A. Gharbawie, Bryan Kolb, & J. A. Kleim. (2006). Experience-dependent amelioration of motor impairments in adulthood following neonatal medial frontal cortex injury in rats is accompanied by motor map expansion. Neuroscience. 141(3). 1315–1326. 16 indexed citations
15.
Connor, Steve, Preston Williams, Blair C. Armstrong, et al.. (2006). Long-term potentiation is associated with changes in synaptic ultrastructure in the rat neocortex. Synapse. 59(6). 378–382. 21 indexed citations
16.
Gharbawie, Omar A., Claudia L. R. Gonzalez, Preston Williams, J. A. Kleim, & Ian Q. Whishaw. (2004). Middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke produces dysfunction in adjacent motor cortex as detected by intracortical microstimulation in rats. Neuroscience. 130(3). 601–610. 46 indexed citations
17.
Gonzalez, Claudia L. R., Omar A. Gharbawie, Preston Williams, et al.. (2004). Evidence for bilateral control of skilled movements: ipsilateral skilled forelimb reaching deficits and functional recovery in rats follow motor cortex and lateral frontal cortex lesions. European Journal of Neuroscience. 20(12). 3442–3452. 87 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026