This map shows the geographic impact of Poonam Puri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Poonam Puri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Poonam Puri more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Poonam Puri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Poonam Puri. The network helps show where Poonam Puri may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Poonam Puri
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Poonam Puri.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Poonam Puri based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Poonam Puri. Poonam Puri is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Puri, Poonam, et al.. (2015). The Role of Corporate Governance in Curbing Foreign Corrupt Business Practices. eYLS (Yale Law School). 53(1). 164–230.1 indexed citations
Puri, Poonam. (2014). Profitable Justice: Aligning Third-Party Financing of Litigation with the Normative Functions of the Canadian Judicial System. SSRN Electronic Journal.
5.
Puri, Poonam. (2012). Securities Litigation and Enforcement: The Canadian Perspective. Brooklyn journal of international law. 37(3). 5.2 indexed citations
Puri, Poonam. (2009). The Future of Stakeholder Interests in Corporate Governance. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
9.
Puri, Poonam. (2009). Legal Origins, Investor Protection, and Canada. Brigham Young University law review. 2009(6). 1671–1700.2 indexed citations
10.
Halpern, Paul & Poonam Puri. (2007). 'Canada Steps Up' - Task Force to Modernize Securities Legislation in Canada: Recommendations and Discussions. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
11.
Puri, Poonam, et al.. (2006). Dual Class Shares in Canada: A Historical Analysis. eYLS (Yale Law School). 29(1). 117.2 indexed citations
12.
Puri, Poonam & Adam C. Pritchard. (2006). The Regulation of Public Auditing in Canada and the United States: Self-Regulation or Government Regulation?. eYLS (Yale Law School).5 indexed citations
13.
Puri, Poonam. (2005). Enforcement Effectiveness in the Canadian Capital Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
14.
Puri, Poonam, et al.. (2004). Proportionate Liability Under the CBCA in the Context of Recent Corporate Governance Reform: Canadian Auditors in the Wrong Place at the Wrong Time?. eYLS (Yale Law School).4 indexed citations
15.
Puri, Poonam, et al.. (2004). The Canadian Oppression Remedy Judicially Considered: 1995 - 2001. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
16.
Puri, Poonam & Jeffrey A. Larsen. (2004). Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation in the 21st Century. eYLS (Yale Law School).1 indexed citations
17.
Puri, Poonam. (2001). Taking Stock of Taking Stock. Cornell law review/The Cornell law quarterly. 87(1). 99.1 indexed citations
18.
Puri, Poonam. (2001). Sentencing the Criminal Corporation. SSRN Electronic Journal.
19.
Puri, Poonam. (2001). The Capital Markets Perspective on a National Securities Regulator. 51(1). 20.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.