P.M. YATE

459 citations
11 papers · 289 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

P.M. YATE

11 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers

P.M. YATE
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 219
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 82
  • Developmental Neuroscience 56
  • Surgery 94
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 48
Replace Johann Kugler with:
Johann Kugler Germany
Ian Carson United Kingdom
G. H. Beemer Australia
D. Russell United Kingdom
Vivian L. B. Oei-Lim Netherlands
Sudha A. Ved United States
N.W. LEES United Kingdom
Rémi Souron France
P.S. SEBEL United Kingdom
ARUN V. BIDWAI United States
P.M. YATE relative to Johann Kugler Germany Johann Kugler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Johann Kugler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P.M. YATE

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P.M. YATE's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P.M. YATE with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P.M. YATE more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P.M. YATE

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P.M. YATE. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P.M. YATE. The network helps show where P.M. YATE may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside P.M. YATE, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P.M. YATE Line = papers co-authored together P.M. YATE links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 198767
2 199743
3 198633
4 198630
5 198329
6 199023
7 198221
8 199120
9
Anaesthesia with ICI 35,868 monitored by the cerebral function analysing monitor (CFAM).
198611
10 198210
11 19892

About P.M. YATE

P.M. YATE is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience, Surgery and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (8 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (4 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (219 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (82 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (56 citations), Surgery (94 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (48 citations). P.M. YATE has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. J. Flynn, Robert W. Arnold, E. Major, R. J. Simmonds, M Cafferkey, P.S. SEBEL, John M. Morton, Elaine Douglas, Peter S. Sebel and Thomas K. Waddell. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anaesthesia and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact